Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. MiniMax M2-her
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how MiniMax M2-her compares on this challenge:

  • MiniMax M2-her vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • MiniMax M2-her vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • MiniMax M2-her vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to MiniMax M2-her

Mini LBO Underwrite

Minimax M2 Her's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

MiniMax M2-her
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

MiniMax M2-her
Response

minimax-m2-her logo
MiniMax M2-herMini LBO Underwrite
minimax-m2-her logo
MiniMax M2-her

HTS LBO Model

1) Year-By-Year Projections

YearRevenueEBITDACash Interest (TL)Cash Interest (Mezz)Cash TaxesCapexΔNWCFree Cash FlowTL BalanceMezz Balance
2025$900.00m$120.00m$43.20m$21.60m$0.00m$27.00m$0.00m-$28.80m$480.00m$198.00m
2026$972.00m$136.08m$43.20m$21.60m$12.78m$29.16m$3.60m$25.74m$436.80m$224.04m
2027$1,040.04m$156.01m$43.20m$21.60m$20.15m$31.20m$3.40m$36.45m$393.60m$250.08m
2028$1,102.44m$181.90m$43.20m$21.60m$29.28m$33.07m$3.12m$51.63m$350.40m$276.12m
2029$1,157.56m$190.99m$43.20m$21.60m$31.55m$34.73m$2.76m$57.15m$307.20m$302.16m
2030$1,215.44m$206.63m$43.20m$21.60m$35.46m$36.46m$2.89m$67.02m$264.00m$328.20m

2) Exit and Returns

  • EV at Exit: 10.5 * $206.63m = $2,169.54m
  • Exit Fees: 1.0% * $2,169.54m = $21.70m
  • Net Exit Proceeds: $2,169.54m - $21.70m - $264.00m - $328.20m = $1,555.64m
  • Equity MOIC: $1,555.64m / $396.00m = 3.93x
  • Equity IRR: 31.5%

3) IRR Sensitivity Table

Exit Multiple \ EBITDA Margin16%17%18%
9.5x25%27%28%
10.5x30%32%33%
11.5x34%36%37%

4) Risks and Downside Protections

Key Underwriting Risks:

  1. Revenue Concentration - Reliance on a few large clients in the volatile data center market.
  2. Technological Disruption - Emerging cooling technologies could make traditional maintenance less critical.
  3. Recession Sensitivity - Data center construction/expansion could freeze during economic downturns.
  4. Interest Rate Risk - Floating rates on the debt could strain cash flow if rates rise.
  5. Execution Risk - Delays integrating any acquired businesses could impact margins.

Concrete Downside Protections:

  1. Conservative Leverage - Using only 5.5x total leverage, well below market peaks, provides breathing room.
  2. Margin Expansion Strategy - Aggressively driving margins from 13.3% to 17.0% creates significant cash flow cushion.
  3. Contract Recurrence - Long-term service contracts provide visibility and stability to revenue and cash flow.
  4. Focus on Cash Paydown - Prioritizing debt reduction over dividends strengthens the balance sheet over time.
  5. Operational Improvements - Tight controls on capital expenditures and working capital improve cash conversion cycles.
Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About MiniMax M2-her

Capabilities

ConversationReasoning

Categories

Text

Specifications

Provider
Minimax
Released
2026-01-27
Size
LARGE
Context
65,536 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

MiniMax M2-her vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival