4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Mistral Medium 3's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
This architecture has several potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. Below is a detailed analysis with proposed solutions and their trade-offs:
Issue: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections, meaning clients connected to different servers won’t receive real-time updates from each other. This breaks the collaborative experience.
Solution:
Issue: Relying on client timestamps for conflict resolution is unreliable due to clock skew. Two users editing the same paragraph could lead to lost updates if timestamps are close.
Solution:
Issue: Servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds, which is inefficient and doesn’t scale well with many servers.
Solution:
Issue: Saving full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds is inefficient for large documents and can lead to high storage costs.
Solution:
Issue: Storing JWT tokens in localStorage is vulnerable to XSS attacks.
Solution:
Issue: Caching API responses for 5 minutes in CloudFront can lead to stale document data.
Solution:
Issue: Read replicas can serve stale data, leading to inconsistencies in real-time collaboration.
Solution:
Issue: If one organization has a very active document, its partition could become a bottleneck.
Solution:
Issue: Changes are only broadcast to clients connected to the same server, requiring other servers to poll for updates.
Solution:
Issue: A malicious user could spam WebSocket messages, overwhelming the server.
Solution:
These changes would significantly improve reliability, scalability, and security but come with added complexity and operational overhead.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link