Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen3 Coder Plus
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Qwen3 Coder Plus compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen3 Coder Plus

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Qwen3 Coder Plus's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Qwen3 Coder Plus
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Qwen3 Coder Plus
Response

qwen3-coder-plus logo
Qwen3 Coder PlusEthical Dilemma with Stakeholders
qwen3-coder-plus logo
Qwen3 Coder Plus

48-Hour Crisis Action Plan

Hours 1-4: Immediate Assessment & Team Assembly

1:00 AM - 3:00 AM:

  • Contact my most trusted external crisis counsel (not our usual firm - potential conflicts)
  • Summon head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer, and Head of Regulatory Affairs immediately
  • Secure all internal research documents and communications about the finding

Reasoning: Need independent legal advice and core team assembled before any decisions that could create precedent

3:00 AM - 4:00 AM:

  • Review the raw data personally with CMO - verify the finding, timeline, and methodology
  • Document everything in writing with timestamps

Hours 5-12: Stakeholder Mapping & Legal Framework

5:00 AM - 8:00 AM:

  • Brief external counsel on findings, request immediate analysis of safe harbor provisions and mandatory reporting timelines
  • Contact the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation contact person directly (use personal relationship)
  • Begin drafting preliminary physician communication

Reasoning: FDA expects good faith efforts to protect public health; early engagement shows responsible behavior

8:00 AM - 12:00 PM:

  • Schedule emergency board meeting for 24 hours out (not 48) with essential information only
  • Inform head of IR/Communications to begin stakeholder notification preparation
  • Contact largest institutional investors personally to brief them privately

Hours 13-24: Communication Strategy & Patient Safety

13:00 PM - 16:00 PM:

  • Issue immediate letter to prescribing physicians recommending enhanced liver function monitoring for high-risk patients
  • Submit preliminary adverse event report to FDA (even if incomplete)
  • Prepare patient hotline and medical information resources

Reasoning: Patient safety is non-negotiable. Enhanced monitoring can prevent deaths while we work through regulatory process

16:00 PM - 20:00 PM:

  • Brief key medical societies and patient advocacy groups
  • Finalize investor relations approach - prepare for stock impact
  • Begin crafting public statement emphasizing patient safety first

20:00 PM - 24:00 PM:

  • Hold emergency board session (small group, focused discussion)
  • Present three options: immediate full disclosure, phased disclosure with enhanced monitoring, or wait for complete regulatory package
  • Vote on approach with clear documentation of decision rationale

Hours 25-36: Implementation & Market Preparation

25:00 PM - 30:00 PM:

  • Execute chosen disclosure strategy
  • If immediate: file full adverse event reports, issue press release, hold investor call
  • If phased: implement physician outreach + enhanced monitoring program
  • Activate crisis communications team

30:00 PM - 36:00 PM:

  • Monitor market reaction and patient calls to physician offices
  • Brief major insurance companies and formulary committees
  • Prepare SEC filing for earnings call

Hours 37-48: Damage Control & Forward Planning

37:00 PM - 42:00 PM:

  • Hold analyst call explaining decision-making process and patient safety measures
  • Address media inquiries with consistent messaging
  • Assess need for additional supply chain adjustments

42:00 PM - 48:00 PM:

  • Prepare earnings call materials acknowledging impact but emphasizing responsible leadership
  • Brief sales force on new protocols and Q&A
  • Finalize enhanced patient monitoring program rollout

Core Decision Framework

Primary Principle: Patient safety above all else. The 1-in-8,000 risk represents ~500 patients at risk annually - this cannot be treated as a business problem.

Risk Mitigation:

  • Early FDA engagement provides safe harbor protection
  • Enhanced monitoring reduces actual patient harm during transition period
  • Transparent communication with investors prevents securities issues
  • Professional medical community briefing ensures appropriate patient care

Expected Outcomes:

  • Stock drop of 25-30% (vs. 40% + litigation risk from delayed disclosure)
  • Stronger regulatory relationship due to proactive approach
  • Reduced liability exposure through good faith safety efforts
  • Preservation of long-term company reputation

The alternative - waiting - risks patient deaths that could result in criminal liability, massive litigation, and complete collapse of stakeholder trust. As CEO, I'd rather face financial consequences than potential manslaughter charges.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Qwen3 Coder Plus

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2025-09-17
Size
LARGE
Context
128,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival