4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Qwen3 Coder's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
Here are the critical issues I've identified in this architecture:
Problem: When an API server crashes or restarts, all WebSocket connections are lost, and clients won't know about changes processed by that server.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Increased complexity vs. guaranteed message delivery
Problem: Client-generated timestamps for conflict resolution are unreliable due to clock drift, leading to inconsistent conflict resolution.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Slightly higher latency vs. correct ordering guarantees
Problem: Server A processes change, broadcasts to its clients, but Server B's 2-second poll hasn't occurred yet, so Server B's clients see stale data.
Solution:
Trade-offs: More complex infrastructure vs. real-time consistency
Problem: Client makes change, reads document before change is committed to database, seeing stale data.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Increased memory usage vs. consistency guarantees
Problem: Every change writes to PostgreSQL, and polling creates read pressure. Full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds are expensive.
Solution:
Trade-offs: More complex data model vs. database scalability
Problem: Each server only broadcasts to its own connected clients, creating inconsistent views during cross-server collaboration.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Additional infrastructure vs. global consistency
Problem: 5-minute CDN caching conflicts with real-time collaboration needs.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Reduced cache efficiency vs. real-time accuracy
Problem: JWT in localStorage is vulnerable to XSS attacks.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Slightly more complex auth flow vs. security
Problem: Last-write-wins can lose data when multiple users edit simultaneously.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Significant complexity increase vs. data integrity
Problem: Redis session cache can become inconsistent or lost during failures.
Solution:
Trade-offs: Infrastructure complexity vs. session reliability
The architecture needs fundamental changes to support true real-time collaboration at scale, particularly around consistency models and communication patterns.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link