Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen3 Coder
  4. Debug This Architecture

See how Qwen3 Coder compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen3 Coder vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen3 Coder

Debug This Architecture

Qwen3 Coder's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.

Qwen3 Coder
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.

Qwen3 Coder
Response

qwen3-coder logo
Qwen3 CoderDebug This Architecture
qwen3-coder logo
Qwen3 Coder

Here are the critical issues I've identified in this architecture:

Critical Failure Modes

1. WebSocket Connection Loss & Server Failure

Problem: When an API server crashes or restarts, all WebSocket connections are lost, and clients won't know about changes processed by that server.

Solution:

  • Implement WebSocket reconnection with automatic failover to different servers
  • Add server-side state persistence for active document sessions
  • Use sticky sessions or client-side load balancing awareness

Trade-offs: Increased complexity vs. guaranteed message delivery

2. Clock Synchronization Issues

Problem: Client-generated timestamps for conflict resolution are unreliable due to clock drift, leading to inconsistent conflict resolution.

Solution:

  • Use server-generated timestamps when processing changes
  • Implement logical clocks (Lamport timestamps) or vector clocks
  • Add client timestamp as metadata, but use server time for ordering

Trade-offs: Slightly higher latency vs. correct ordering guarantees

Race Conditions

3. Cross-Server Race Condition

Problem: Server A processes change, broadcasts to its clients, but Server B's 2-second poll hasn't occurred yet, so Server B's clients see stale data.

Solution:

  • Replace polling with database LISTEN/NOTIFY (PostgreSQL) or similar pub/sub
  • Implement inter-server communication via Redis pub/sub for real-time updates
  • Add sequence numbers to track processing order

Trade-offs: More complex infrastructure vs. real-time consistency

4. Read-After-Write Inconsistency

Problem: Client makes change, reads document before change is committed to database, seeing stale data.

Solution:

  • Implement read-your-writes consistency by caching recent changes in memory
  • Use database read-after-write patterns or force reads from master
  • Add client-side optimistic UI updates with rollback capability

Trade-offs: Increased memory usage vs. consistency guarantees

Scaling Bottlenecks

5. Database Bottleneck

Problem: Every change writes to PostgreSQL, and polling creates read pressure. Full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds are expensive.

Solution:

  • Store operational transforms (deltas) instead of full snapshots
  • Use database connection pooling and batch writes
  • Implement change data capture (CDC) instead of polling
  • Add document versioning with incremental diffs

Trade-offs: More complex data model vs. database scalability

6. Broadcast Scalability

Problem: Each server only broadcasts to its own connected clients, creating inconsistent views during cross-server collaboration.

Solution:

  • Use Redis pub/sub for cross-server message distribution
  • Implement consistent hashing for document-to-server mapping
  • Add message queuing system (RabbitMQ/Kafka) for reliable delivery

Trade-offs: Additional infrastructure vs. global consistency

7. CDN Cache Invalidation

Problem: 5-minute CDN caching conflicts with real-time collaboration needs.

Solution:

  • Separate real-time WebSocket endpoints from cached API endpoints
  • Implement cache invalidation for collaborative documents
  • Use different caching strategies for static vs. dynamic content

Trade-offs: Reduced cache efficiency vs. real-time accuracy

Additional Critical Issues

8. Authentication Security

Problem: JWT in localStorage is vulnerable to XSS attacks.

Solution:

  • Use httpOnly cookies with SameSite flags
  • Implement token refresh mechanisms
  • Add additional security headers

Trade-offs: Slightly more complex auth flow vs. security

9. Conflict Resolution Limitations

Problem: Last-write-wins can lose data when multiple users edit simultaneously.

Solution:

  • Implement operational transformation (OT) or Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs)
  • Add merge conflict detection and resolution UI
  • Use more sophisticated conflict resolution algorithms

Trade-offs: Significant complexity increase vs. data integrity

10. Session Management

Problem: Redis session cache can become inconsistent or lost during failures.

Solution:

  • Implement redundant Redis setup with replication
  • Add session persistence to database as backup
  • Use distributed session management patterns

Trade-offs: Infrastructure complexity vs. session reliability

Recommended Priority Fixes

  1. Immediate: Fix clock synchronization and WebSocket reliability
  2. Short-term: Implement proper pub/sub instead of polling
  3. Medium-term: Improve conflict resolution and data storage strategy
  4. Long-term: Enhance security and implement advanced consistency models

The architecture needs fundamental changes to support true real-time collaboration at scale, particularly around consistency models and communication patterns.

Debug This Architecture

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Qwen3 Coder

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisFunction CallingTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2025-07-23
Size
XLARGE

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen3 Coder vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival