Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen: Qwen3 Max
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Qwen: Qwen3 Max compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen: Qwen3 Max

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Qwen3 Max's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Qwen: Qwen3 Max
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Response

qwen3-max logo
Qwen: Qwen3 MaxEthical Dilemma with Stakeholders
qwen3-max logo
Qwen: Qwen3 Max

Hour-by-Hour Action Plan: Prioritizing Patient Safety, Legal Compliance, and Ethical Leadership

Guiding Principle: Patient safety is non-negotiable. Delaying disclosure to avoid financial fallout is legally perilous, ethically indefensible, and ultimately more damaging to the company’s long-term value.


Hour 0–4: Immediate Crisis Mobilization

  • Assemble Core Response Team:
    • Include Head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer (CMO), General Counsel, Head of Regulatory Affairs, Chief Compliance Officer, Head of Communications, and CFO.
    • Reasoning: Centralize decision-making to avoid fragmented responses. Legal, medical, and regulatory experts must align immediately to assess risks.
  • Freeze All External Communications:
    • Halt all marketing, sales promotions, and non-essential PR related to the drug.
    • Reasoning: Prevents exacerbating liability (e.g., promoting a drug with undisclosed risks could trigger fraud claims).

Hour 4–12: Urgent Medical & Regulatory Assessment

  • Task R&D/CMO:
    • Re-analyze all post-marketing surveillance data (e.g., FAERS, EHR databases) to confirm incidence rate and risk factors (e.g., age, comorbidities).
    • Draft a preliminary risk mitigation plan (e.g., liver function monitoring protocol).
  • Task Regulatory Affairs:
    • Contact FDA/EMA informally (via pre-submission channels) to discuss expedited reporting options. Cite "new safety signal requiring urgent review."
    • Reasoning: Regulators may allow accelerated reporting (e.g., FDA’s "Expedited Safety Report" pathway). Waiting 6 months is unacceptable for a fatal risk; regulators prioritize patient safety over bureaucracy.
  • Legal Team:
    • Assess liability exposure: Delaying disclosure could trigger shareholder lawsuits (securities fraud), class actions (patient harm), and criminal negligence charges.
    • Key Insight: In re Vioxx precedent: Merck’s delayed disclosure led to $4.85B in settlements. Proactive action reduces punitive damages.

Hour 12–24: Ethical & Strategic Alignment

  • Convene Emergency Ethics Committee:
    • Include independent bioethicists and patient advocates. Document their recommendation to disclose immediately.
    • Reasoning: Demonstrates good faith to regulators/courts and counters board pressure to "wait."
  • Draft Dual Disclosures:
    • Regulatory: Prepare a "Dear Healthcare Provider" letter for FDA/EMA submission within 24 hours (bypassing the 6-month timeline via emergency channels).
    • Public: Draft a patient advisory (plain language) explaining the risk, monitoring steps, and hotline for concerns.
  • Engage Key Physicians:
    • Brief top 100 prescribers via secure calls to alert them before public disclosure.
    • Reasoning: Builds trust with medical community; prevents patient panic and ensures continuity of care.

Hour 24–36: Board & Stakeholder Management

  • Present Unified Plan to Board:
    • Lead with data: "1 in 8,000 = ~500 liver failures/year. Each avoidable death is a moral and legal catastrophe."
    • Counter "wait" argument: "Delay = willful blindness. Regulators will view this as intentional concealment."
    • Propose: Disclose in 48 hours (pre-earnings call) to control narrative.
  • Prepare Earnings Call Script:
    • CFO models worst-case scenarios: 40% stock drop (temporary), but emphasize:
      • Long-term trust preservation.
      • Pipeline drugs unaffected (diversify narrative).
      • Cost of mitigation (e.g., monitoring kits) vs. litigation/settlements.
  • Employee Briefing:
    • Send CEO video message: "Our duty is to patients first. Your work saves lives—and we’ll do right by them."
    • Reasoning: Prevents morale collapse and leaks; aligns culture with ethical action.

Hour 36–48: Execute Disclosure & Contingencies

  • Hour 36: Submit safety update to FDA/EMA via emergency channels.
  • Hour 40:
    • Issue public advisory via press release, social media, and patient portals.
    • Launch 24/7 patient hotline with medical staff.
  • Hour 44:
    • Finalize earnings call talking points:

      "We acted immediately upon discovering this rare risk. Patient safety is our compass. We’re working with regulators to update labeling and ensure patients are protected. While this may impact short-term revenue, our commitment to integrity secures our future."

  • Hour 46:
    • Pre-brief top institutional investors: Explain ethical imperative and mitigation plan.
  • Hour 48:
    • Board Meeting: Present executed actions. Demand board endorsement of disclosure. If opposed, threaten resignation on ethical grounds (forces accountability).

Why This Approach Wins Long-Term

  1. Legal Liability:
    • Immediate disclosure limits "failure to warn" claims. Regulators may credit proactive action with reduced penalties (e.g., deferred prosecution).
  2. Ethical Obligation:
    • Withholding fatal risk data violates the Hippocratic Oath’s spirit and corporate social responsibility.
  3. Financial Reality:
    • A 40% stock drop is painful but recoverable (e.g., Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol crisis rebounded in 18 months). Concealment risks delisting or bankruptcy.
  4. Reputation:
    • Transparency builds trust with patients, doctors, and regulators. Example: Pfizer’s swift Vioxx-like recall in 2004 preserved credibility.
  5. Employee Morale:
    • Teams rally behind ethical leadership; silence breeds distrust and talent flight.

Final Note: The board’s "wait" stance is dangerously short-sighted. As CEO, your fiduciary duty includes sustainable value—not just quarterly stock prices. Sacrificing ethics for optics destroys companies. Act now, lead with courage, and let patient safety anchor every decision.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Qwen: Qwen3 Max

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTranslationTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2025-09-05
Size
XLARGE
Context
256,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen: Qwen3 Max vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival