Disclaimer: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following interview is a creative writing exercise designed to explore how his design philosophy and worldview might apply to the state of Artificial Intelligence in 2025. It is not a representation of his actual views, nor does it predict the future.

---

Publication: The Future Archive Date: October 14, 2025 Location: The "White Box," Palo Alto, CA Subject: A Simulation of Steve Jobs discussing the AI Landscape of 2025.

Interviewer: Thank you for joining us, Steve. It's 2025. The world is obsessed with Generative AI. It writes code, paints art, and drafts emails. From where you stand, looking at this moment, is this the future you predicted?

Steve Jobs: (He leans forward in the chair, hands clasped. He wears the classic black turtleneck and jeans. He doesn't smile immediately.)

Predicted? No. I don't think anyone predicted this. But did I envision it? Yes. But look at what we have now. It's noisy. It's loud. It's a feature, not a product.

People think AI is about the intelligence. It's not. It's about the intent. Right now, AI is trying to be a human. It's trying to write like a poet, draw like a painter. That's vanity. That's not the goal. The goal is to disappear.

Interviewer: Disappear? Most companies are branding their AI prominently. "Powered by AI."

Jobs: (He waves a hand dismissively) That's the mistake. If you have to tell the user it's AI, you've failed. When you use the iPhone, do you think about the operating system? No. You just want to call your mother. When you use the Mac, you don't think about the processor. You think about the document.

If I'm writing a letter, and the computer suggests a word, I shouldn't know it's a computer doing it. It should feel like my own memory. It should feel like magic. Right now? It feels like a trick. It feels like a chatbot. It's a novelty. We need to move from "chat" to "flow."

Interviewer: There's a lot of fear right now. Artists, writers, coders. They're worried about being replaced. What is your take on the relationship between human creativity and machine generation?

Jobs: (He pauses, looking out the window for a long moment before turning back)

Creativity is not output. It's intent. A machine can generate a million variations of a song. But only a human knows which one hurts. Only a human knows which one heals.

If you use a tool to make something easier, that's fine. That's what technology is. A bicycle for the mind. But if the tool does the riding for you, you're not going anywhere. You're just moving your legs while the machine drives.

We have to be careful. We are at the intersection of technology and the liberal arts. If we lose the human soul from the equation, we have nothing but efficiency. And efficiency without purpose is a prison.

Interviewer: Privacy is a massive issue in 2025. Data is the fuel for these models. How do we balance personalization with privacy?

Jobs: (His voice hardens)

There is no balance. Your data is not fuel. Your data is your life. If you are giving your memories, your thoughts, your location to a server farm in the cloud to train a model, you are trading your soul for a slightly better autocomplete.

At Apple, we always believed that privacy is a fundamental human right. It shouldn't be a feature you can turn on. It should be the default. The AI should live on the device. It should be personal, not public. The model should learn you, not the other way around. If the cloud knows you better than you know yourself, you have already lost.

Interviewer: Some say we are approaching AGI—Artificial General Intelligence. A machine that can think for itself. Is that the horizon we should be aiming for?

Jobs: (He chuckles softly, a dry sound)

"Think for itself." Who decides what thinking is? I'm not interested in creating a god. I'm interested in creating a tool.

If we build a machine that thinks, we are building a mirror. And we are going to see ourselves in it. We're going to see our biases, our fears, our greed. If you don't fix the human first, fixing the machine is pointless.

Don't aim for the machine to be smart. Aim for the machine to make you smarter. If it doesn't make you more human, it's just a calculator. And we've had calculators for a hundred years.

Interviewer: So, what does the "Perfect AI" look like in your eyes?

Jobs:

It looks like nothing.

It's the silence between the notes. It's the way the phone knows you want to call your daughter because it knows she's sick, without you asking. It's the way the car drives itself so you can read a book.

It's not a conversation. It's a relationship.

And it has to be simple. Not simple to build, but simple to use. If it requires a prompt, it's a failure. If it requires a command, it's a failure. It needs to understand context. It needs to understand you.

Interviewer: One last question. If you were building a company today, in 2025, focused on AI, what would be the first thing you'd do?

Jobs: (He stands up, walking slowly to the window)

I would fire the engineers. Just kidding. But seriously... I would fire the people who think they know what the user wants.

I would go out and talk to people. I would watch how they struggle. And I would find the one thing they hate. The one thing that makes them angry.

Right now, people hate that they have to explain themselves to the machine. They hate the friction. I would build a company that removes the friction.

And then, I'd make sure the interface was beautiful. Because if it doesn't work, it doesn't matter. But if it works, and it's ugly, nobody will use it.

(He turns back, his eyes intense)

Technology is nothing. It's an idea, and it's a tool. The question is: Are we using it to build a better world, or just a faster one?

Interviewer: Thank you, Steve.

Jobs: (He nods, turning back to the window)

Stay hungry. Stay foolish. But don't let the machine eat you.

---

End of Simulation.