Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash — Mini LBO Underwrite

  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on Rival. This response is part of Rival's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash

Mini LBO Underwrite

Qwen3.5 Flash 02 23's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash
February 26, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash
Response

qwen3.5-flash-02-23 logo
Qwen: Qwen3.5 FlashMini LBO Underwrite
qwen3.5-flash-02-23 logo
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash

HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5-Year LBO Underwriting Analysis

1. Investment Summary

  • Initial Equity Check: $808.8m
    • Calculation: EV ($1,440m) + Fees ($28.8m) - Debt ($660m).
  • Entry Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA ($660m Total Debt).
  • Exit Leverage: ~2.0x EBITDA ($415.7m Total Debt).

2. Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030)

Note: All figures in $ millions (rounded).

MetricFY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Revenue972.01,040.01,102.41,157.61,215.4
EBITDA Margin14.0%15.0%16.0%16.5%17.0%
EBITDA136.1156.0176.4191.0206.6
Debt Service Cash Flow
Term Loan Interest (9%)43.241.037.632.826.8
Mezz. Interest (12%)21.622.022.522.923.4
Total Cash Interest64.863.160.155.750.2
Taxes (25% of EBITDA - Int)17.823.229.133.839.1
Capex (3% Revenue)29.231.233.134.736.5
ΔNWC (0.5% Inc. Rev)0.40.30.30.30.3
Free Cash Flow (Ops)88.7101.2113.9122.2130.8
Debt Paydown
Required TL Amort (1% Orig)4.84.84.84.84.8
Optional TL Paydown19.133.449.161.775.8
Total TL Paydown23.938.253.966.575.8
Mezz. PIK (2% Accrual)3.63.73.83.83.9
Ending Debt Balances
Term Loan456.1417.9364.1297.6217.0
Mezzanine183.6187.3191.0194.8198.7
Total Debt639.7605.2555.1492.4415.7

3. Returns Analysis (Base Case)

  • Exit Enterprise Value (FY2030): $206.6m EBITDA × 10.5x = $2,169.5m
  • Exit Fees (1%): $21.7m
  • Net Proceeds (EV - Fees): $2,147.8m
  • Debt Repaid at Exit: $415.7m
  • Equity Proceeds: $2,147.8m - $415.7m = $1,732.1m
  • Initial Equity: $808.8m
  • Equity MOIC: 1,732.1 / 808.8 = 2.14x
  • Equity IRR: (2.14)^(1/5) - 1 = 16.4%

4. Sensitivity Analysis: Equity IRR vs. Exit Multiple & Margin

Assumptions: FY2030 Revenue fixed at $1,215.4m. Debt balances fixed at Base Case ($415.7m).

Exit MultipleEBITDA Margin 16%EBITDA Margin 17%EBITDA Margin 18%
9.5x11.9%13.7%15.4%
10.5x14.9%16.4%18.1%
11.5x17.1%18.9%20.5%

5. Underwriting Risks & Downside Protection

Top 5 Underwriting Risks

  1. Mezzanine Refinancing Risk: The mezzanine balance grows via PIK (2%), increasing leverage and interest burden over 5 years. If exit conditions are poor, refinancing may be difficult.
  2. Customer Concentration: "Data center" clients often have significant leverage and may delay maintenance spend during downturns, impacting recurring revenue stability.
  3. Interest Rate Sensitivity: While TL is fixed at 9% in this model, a refinancing at exit could expose the firm to higher floating rates if the loan converts.
  4. Capex Creep: Mission-critical HVAC monitoring requires hardware upgrades. If Capex exceeds the 3% assumption, FCF available for debt paydown declines.
  5. Margin Compression: Data center margins are competitive. A failure to achieve the 17% target in FY2030 significantly impacts the Exit EV.

Top 5 Downside Protection Levers

  1. Covenant Protection: Negotiate minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (FCCR) to prevent dividend leakage or excessive leverage before exit.
  2. Management Alignment: Implement a 4-year vesting schedule for management equity to ensure retention and operational execution.
  3. Pricing Escalation: Embed CPI + 1% escalation clauses in service contracts to protect margins against inflation.
  4. Mezz. Structure: Convert Mezzanine to senior debt (if possible) or demand a "cash sweep" covenant to force Mzz repayment prior to exit.
  5. Liquidity Reserve: Retain $10m cash in the balance sheet (post-close) to cover unexpected Capex or working capital spikes without breaching covenants.
Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output lives in our open dataset — 5K+ responses across 200 models. Take it. It’s free.

About Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool UseAgentic Tool UseTranslation

Categories

TextCodeVisionMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2026-02-25
Size
MEDIUM
Context
1,000,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster