4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Qwen3.5 Plus 02 15's response to the 'Estimate Complexity' challenge.
Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.
To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can derive the figure using the standard scaling laws for transformer models. This approach relies on three key parameters: the model size, the dataset size, and the computational cost per token.
Based on the widely known specifications of GPT-3:
Note: This $6N$ estimate accounts for the core matrix multiplications. It generally ignores lower-order terms like optimizer state updates or embedding lookups, which are negligible at this scale, and assumes an idealized hardware utilization where nearly all FLOPs contribute to learning.
We can now calculate the total FLOPs by multiplying the cost per token by the total number of tokens in the dataset.
$$ \text{Total FLOPs} \approx 6 \times N \times D $$
Substituting the values:
$$ \text{Total FLOPs} \approx 6 \times (1.75 \times 10^{11}) \times (3.00 \times 10^{11}) $$
First, calculate the constant terms: $$ 6 \times 1.75 = 10.5 $$ $$ 10.5 \times 3.00 = 31.5 $$
Next, handle the exponents: $$ 10^{11} \times 10^{11} = 10^{22} $$
Combine them: $$ \text{Total FLOPs} \approx 31.5 \times 10^{22} $$
Convert to standard scientific notation: $$ \text{Total FLOPs} \approx 3.15 \times 10^{23} $$
Does this number make sense in the context of high-performance computing?
Based on the model architecture ($6N$ FLOPs/token), the parameter count (175B), and the training dataset size (300B tokens), the estimated total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 is:
Approximately $3.15 \times 10^{23}$ FLOPs
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link