ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) at $0.11/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 takes Image Generation. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 25x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Input
$5.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
45× cheaper
Output
$0.60
25× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 45× input, 25× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
56%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 2.8x more transitions
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
55%Vocabulary56%
24wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.37
3.3Bold5.7
6.0Lists4.0
0.94Emoji0.54
0.63Headings0.70
0.05Transitions0.14
Based on 15 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Claude Opus 4New provider
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Ring 2.6 1TNew provider
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Seed 2.0 CodeNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Seed 2.0 LiteNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Seed 2.1 TurboNew provider