ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 4 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 131K, tested across 32 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 4 blind community votes on Rival. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 128K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's 131K. On pricing, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In community voting, In 4 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 4 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 4+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 4 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Image Generation. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 2.8x more transitions
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
