Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
14× cheaper
Output
$0.60
4.2× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 14× input, 4.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
42%Vocabulary56%
24wSentence Length14w
0.76Hedging0.37
3.7Bold5.7
6.3Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.74Headings0.70
0.11Transitions0.14
Based on 12 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
