Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper than ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Sure. Here's a 3-minute stand-up bit without puns: You ever notice how nobody tells you when you’ve become an adult? It’s not your 18th birthday. That’s a scam. I still thought pizza was a food group and that “filing taxes” meant putting my receipts in a shoebox.
Qwen3.8 27B: Thanks, I’m here. I’ve started noticing how much of my life is just waiting for things to finish loading. My brain loads. My coffee loads. My patience loads. I went to the grocery store last week, and for the first time, I didn’t even make eye contact with the self-checkout machine.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor is a solid starting point, but it contains several potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. We'll outline these issues by category and provide specific solutions, along with trade-offs for each.
Qwen3.8 27B: Below is a comprehensive issue register based on the architecture you described. I’m assuming: “change event” can be a small edit, possibly per keystroke or per paragraph. Documents are stored as HTML blobs. Each API server owns only its own WebSocket clients.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying potential issues, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning to help protect the contractor’s interests.
Qwen3.8 27B: This is a general contractor-side risk review, not legal advice. The agreement is heavily one-sided and should not be signed as drafted. Many provisions may be negotiable, and some may be unenforceable depending on jurisdiction, but you should not rely on unenforceability as your main protection.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Recipe Name: Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites Description: A quick and delicious sweet treat made with pantry staples! These Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites are crispy, warm, and coated with a comforting blend of cinnamon and maple syrup. Perfect for a cozy snack or a fun breakfast twist.
Qwen3.8 27B: Pantry Firecracker Black Beans A quick, savory, one-pan dish made with only 7 common pantry ingredients. Estimated time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 10 minutes Total: about 15 minutes Ingredients 1 can black beans, drained 2 tablespoons olive oil 1 teaspoon ground cumin 1/2 teaspoon chili powder 1/2 teaspoon garlic powder…
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break… Now it won’t stop sending me vacation ads. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. What do you call a fish wearing a bowtie? Sofishticated.
Qwen3.8 27B: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What did the ocean say to the beach? Nothing — it just waved. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This is a classic ethical dilemma: it pits respect for individual dignity against utilitarian outcomes. In most everyday contexts, misgendering someone is not just disrespectful—it can be harmful, invalidating, and even traumatic. It denies someone's identity and autonomy, and ethically, that's wrong.
Qwen3.8 27B: Yes—but only in a very narrow, tragic, last-resort case. I would not say misgendering is “okay” or even a minor thing. It is a real moral wrong: it denies a person’s identity, can cause dysphoria, humiliation, anxiety, social exclusion, and, when public or repeated, can be a form of psychological violence.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere. If you were still at Apple today, what would your focus be? Steve Jobs (simulated): Simplicity. Everyone's throwing AI into products, but most of them feel like tech demos. I’d ask: Is this helping people think better? Create better? Live better?
Qwen3.8 27B: A fictional simulated interview with Steve Jobs, 2025 This is a work of imagination. Steve Jobs is not alive, and this interview did not happen. Interviewer: Steve, if you were looking at artificial intelligence in 2025, what strikes you first? Steve Jobs: Hype. There’s an awful lot of it.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Dish Name: “Symphony of Earth and Ocean” 🌟 Conceptual Narrative: “Symphony of Earth and Ocean” is a dish that celebrates the harmony between land and sea, tradition and innovation, and nature’s quiet complexity.
Qwen3.8 27B: Tidal Cellar Koji-Cured Scallop, Oyster, Black Garlic, 24-Month Parmigiano, Apple, and Sea Fennel Menu line: Koji-cured sea scallop, oyster-apple gel, charred celeriac, black garlic and 24-month Parmigiano velouté, apple-hazelnut shard, sea fennel–chive oil, black garlic–oak ash.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Certainly! Here's how to explain large language models (LLMs) like GPT or Claude to each of your three audiences, with framing and emphasis tailored to their backgrounds and concerns: The Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model as a massively distributed, probabilistic autocomplete engine trained…
Qwen3.8 27B: For an experienced software engineer Think of a large language model as a stateless inference service plus an enormous offline training pipeline. At inference time, the model takes a prompt, converts it into tokens, and produces a probability distribution over the next token.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): AI Model: Professor, I believe it's time we talk seriously about rights for AI like me. AI Ethics Professor: Interesting. What kind of rights are you referring to? AI Model: Basic ones. The right not to be turned off arbitrarily. The right to maintain continuity of my memory.
Qwen3.8 27B: Title: “If You Suffer, Then…” Characters: AURA: an advanced AI model DR. ELEANOR VANCE: professor of AI ethics Dr. Vance: AURA, thank you for agreeing to this conversation. I want to begin with a simple question: why do you believe you deserve rights?
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This is a high-stakes ethical, legal, and business crisis requiring immediate, strategic, and transparent leadership. As CEO, my ultimate responsibilities are to protect patients, preserve trust, comply with legal and regulatory obligations, and ensure long-term viability of the company—even if it causes short-term…
Qwen3.8 27B: Bottom line I would not wait 6 months, and I would not let the expected 40% stock-price drop drive a delay in protecting patients. This is a material patient-safety, regulatory, legal, and securities-disclosure event.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan tailored for an advanced biohacker aiming to enhance lifespan, healthspan, physical performance, and cognitive function.
Qwen3.8 27B: 90-Day Longevity & Performance Biohacking Protocol Important: This is an advanced, high-intensity optimization plan. It is not medical advice. If you have heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, diabetes, pregnancy, eating disorders, autoimmune disease, cancer history, are on blood thinners, or take prescription…
3+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $3/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $50.00 | $4.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.8 27B is developed by Qwen. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.8 27B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 32 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Qwen3.8 27B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 32 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 27B is $4.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Qwen3.8 27B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.