Compare ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) by OpenAI against QwQ 32B by Qwen, in 15 community votes, qwq 32b wins 57% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 40K, tested across 13 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
QwQ 32B is the better choice overall, winning 57% of 15 blind community votes on Rival. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 128K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) is made by openai while QwQ 32B is from qwen. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. In community voting, In 15 community votes, QwQ 32B wins 57% of head-to-head duels.
In 15 community votes, QwQ 32B wins 57% of head-to-head duels. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) leads in Web Design, while QwQ 32B leads in Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 15+ human preference judgments for this pair.
QwQ 32B has the edge overall. In 15 blind votes, QwQ 32B wins 57% of the time.
Pick ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) for Web Design. Pick QwQ 32B for Reasoning. QwQ 32B is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) uses 94.5x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

Compare ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) by OpenAI against QwQ 32B by Qwen, in 15 community votes, qwq 32b wins 57% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 40K, tested across 13 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
QwQ 32B is the better choice overall, winning 57% of 15 blind community votes on Rival. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 128K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) is made by openai while QwQ 32B is from qwen. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. In community voting, In 15 community votes, QwQ 32B wins 57% of head-to-head duels.
In 15 community votes, QwQ 32B wins 57% of head-to-head duels. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) leads in Web Design, while QwQ 32B leads in Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 15+ human preference judgments for this pair.
QwQ 32B has the edge overall. In 15 blind votes, QwQ 32B wins 57% of the time.
Pick ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) for Web Design. Pick QwQ 32B for Reasoning. QwQ 32B is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) uses 94.5x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

8 fights queued
8 fights queued