Compare Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic against Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 12 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude 3 Haiku and Llama 3.1 405B are both competitive models. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Haiku is made by anthropic while Llama 3.1 405B is from meta. Claude 3 Haiku has a 200K token context window compared to Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. On pricing, Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B.
Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper on both — 11× input, 2.5× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 3.1 405B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Claude 3 Haiku uses 34.3x more bold
Compare Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic against Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 12 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude 3 Haiku and Llama 3.1 405B are both competitive models. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Haiku is made by anthropic while Llama 3.1 405B is from meta. Claude 3 Haiku has a 200K token context window compared to Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. On pricing, Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B.
Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper on both — 11× input, 2.5× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 3.1 405B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Claude 3 Haiku uses 34.3x more bold