Claude 3 OpusvsGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper than Claude 3 Opus at $0.25/M vs $15/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $0.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 500K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2024 | Dec 2024 |
| MMLU | 86.8% | 82.3% |
Our Verdict
Claude 3 Opus
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs 150x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3 Opus
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input
$0.25
60× cheaper
Output
$0.50
150× cheaper
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both: 60× input, 150× output.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
56%
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking uses 376.7x more bold
Claude 3 Opus
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
54%Vocabulary54%
14wSentence Length15w
0.48Hedging0.64
0.0Bold3.8
3.0Lists2.4
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings0.03
0.06Transitions0.30
Based on 3 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-4o (Omni)New provider
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-5New provider
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Ling 2.6 1TNew provider
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Ling 2.6 FlashNew provider
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 3 70BNew provider
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider