Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-4o (Omni)
Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, in 8 community votes, gemini 2.0 flash thinking and gpt-4o (omni) are closely matched, context windows of 500K vs 128K, tested across 21 shared challenges.
Reasoning: GPT-4o (Omni) wins 67% of votes
Image Generation: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
GPT-4o (Omni)
Too close to call. Pick based on your use case.
Pick Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking for Image Generation. Pick GPT-4o (Omni) for Reasoning. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 20x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input
$0.25
10× cheaper
Output
$0.50
20× cheaper
GPT-4o (Omni)
Input
$2.50
Output
$10.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 10× input, 20× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
58%
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
GPT-4o (Omni)
54%Vocabulary54%
15wSentence Length18w
0.64Hedging0.72
3.8Bold7.3
2.4Lists5.6
0.00Emoji0.03
0.03Headings1.40
0.30Transitions0.26
Based on 13 + 24 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
