Compare Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 11 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental are both competitive models. Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Opus is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is from google. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is cheaper on both — 15× input, 38× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental uses 557.3x more bold
Compare Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 11 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental are both competitive models. Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Opus is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is from google. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is cheaper on both — 15× input, 38× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental uses 557.3x more bold