Compare Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 8K, tested across 8 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3 Opus and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 200K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Opus is made by anthropic while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
PaLM 2 Chat is cheaper on both — 30× input, 150× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude 3 Opus has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 150x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
PaLM 2 Chat uses 335.2x more bold
Compare Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 8K, tested across 8 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3 Opus and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 200K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3 Opus is made by anthropic while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
PaLM 2 Chat is cheaper on both — 30× input, 150× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude 3 Opus has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 150x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
PaLM 2 Chat uses 335.2x more bold