Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs DeepSeek R1 0528

Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, context windows of 200K vs 164K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and DeepSeek R1 0528 are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0/M for DeepSeek R1 0528. Context windows: 200K vs 164K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and DeepSeek R1 0528

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while DeepSeek R1 0528 is from deepseek. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 164K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0/M for DeepSeek R1 0528.

Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
75%

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) uses 8.7x more transitions

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
DeepSeek R1 0528
66%Vocabulary64%
74wSentence Length10w
0.72Hedging0.30
0.3Bold6.8
8.9Lists4.9
0.00Emoji0.00
0.06Headings0.40
0.09Transitions0.00
Based on 21 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)DeepSeek R1 0528

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions