Skip to content
Rival
Models
Compare
Best ForArenaPricing
Sign Up
Sign Up

We compare AI models for a living. On purpose. We chose this.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Find Your Model
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Best AI For...
  • Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • Research
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor a Model
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built at hours no one should be awake, on hardware we don't own
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs PaLM 2 Chat: Which Is Better? [2026 Comparison]
Rival
Models
Compare
Best ForArenaPricing
Sign Up
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs PaLM 2 Chat
Updated Jun 1, 2024

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs PaLM 2 Chat

Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 8K, tested across 17 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or PaLM 2 Chat?

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 200K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and PaLM 2 Chat

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.

Loading share button...

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)vsPaLM 2 Chat

17 fights queued

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) logo

Why Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)?

24.4x more context200K
11 months newerJun 2024
PaLM 2 Chat logo

Why PaLM 2 Chat?

20.4x cheaper overall$0.50/M in · $0.50/M out
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)PaLM 2 Chat
Input price
$3.00/M
$0.50/M
Output price
$15.00/M
$0.50/M
Context
200K
8K
Released
Jun 2024
Jul 2023

Favorites

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)PaLM 2 Chat
Movie
The Princess Bride

The Princess Bride

19877.7
—
Album
Kind of Blue

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis
—
Book
Братья Карамазовы

Братья Карамазовы

Фёдор Михайлович Достоевский
—
City
Tokyo

Tokyo

Japan
—
Game
Portal

Portal

Action, Puzzle4.5
—
12 / 17
01

Estimate Complexityreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024text

I'll help you estimate the FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 from first principles. Let's break this down step by step.

  1. Model Architecture Parameters
  • GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters
  • Uses transformer architecture with attention mechanism
  • Training involves forward pass, backward pass, and optimizer updates
  1. Key Components per Token For each token in the sequence, we need to calculate:

a) Self-Attention

  • Query, Key, Value projections: 3 × (n_emb × n_emb)
  • Attention scores: n_seq × n_seq × n_emb
  • Attention output: n_seq × n_emb × n_emb
  • For h=96 attention heads

b) Feed-Forward Network (FFN)

  • Two linear transformations
  • First projection: n_emb × (4 × n_emb)
  • Second projection: (4 × n_emb) × n_emb
  • GELU activations
  1. Training Details
  • Context length: 2048 tokens
  • Batch size: ~1.5M tokens per batch (approximate)
  • Training tokens: ~300B tokens
  1. FLOPs Calculation

Let's calculate for one forward pass through a single token:

a) Self-Attention FLOPs

  • QKV projections: 3 × (12288 × 12288) = ~450M FLOPs
  • Attention scores: 2048 × 2048 × 12288 = ~50B FLOPs
  • Attention output: 2048 × 12288 × 12288 = ~300B FLOPs
  • Multiply by 96 heads: ~35T FLOPs

b) FFN FLOPs

  • First projection: 12288 × 49152 = ~600M FLOPs
  • Second projection: 49152 × 12288 = ~600M FLOPs
  • Total FFN: ~1.2B FLOPs

c) Per Token Total

  • Forward pass: ~36T FLOPs
  • Backward pass (roughly 2x forward): ~72T FLOPs
  • Parameter updates (1x forward): ~36T FLOPs
  • Total per token: ~144T FLOPs
  1. Total Training FLOPs
  • Number of tokens: 300B
  • FLOPs per token: 144T
  • Total FLOPs: 300B × 144T = ~43,200 Zettaflops (4.32 × 10^22 FLOPs)

This is a rough estimate that considers:

  • Main computational bottlenecks
  • Both forward and backward passes
  • Parameter updates
  • Major attention and FFN operations

The actual number might be higher due to:

  • Additional layer normalizations
  • Activation functions
  • Memory access operations
  • Optimizer-specific computations (Adam)
  • Various other overhead operations

This estimate aligns with the general understanding that training large language models requires enormous computational resources, in the order of zettaflops of compute.

Note: This is an approximation based on the model's known architecture and typical training procedures. The actual number could vary based on specific implementation details, optimizations, and hardware-specific considerations.

Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text

To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online, we can make several assumptions and perform calculations based on the information available about GPT-3's architecture and training process. Here's a step-by-step explanation of the reasoning:
Step 1: Determine the number of parameters in GPT-3

GPT-3 is a massive language model with 175 billion parameters. Each parameter represents a trainable weight in the neural network, and updating these weights during training requires floating-point operations (FLOPs).

Step 2: Estimate the number of training iterations

The number of training iterations refers to how many times the entire training dataset is passed through the neural network during the training process. Although the exact number may vary, let's assume that GPT-3 was trained for 100 epochs.

Step 3: Calculate the FLOPs per iteration

During each training iteration, the neural network performs forward and backward passes. The forward pass involves computing the output of the network given the input, while the backward pass involves calculating the gradients of the loss function with respect to the network's weights.
For simplicity, we can assume that the forward and backward passes have roughly the same number of FLOPs. Therefore, the total FLOPs per iteration can be estimated by multiplying the number of parameters by 2 (forward and backward passes).

Total FLOPs per iteration = (Number of parameters) x 2

(175 billion parameters) x 2 = 350 billion FLOPs per iteration

Step 4: Calculate the total FLOPs for training

Multiplying the FLOPs per iteration by the number of training iterations gives us the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3.

Total FLOPs for training = (FLOPs per iteration) x (Number of iterations)

(350 billion FLOPs per iteration) x (100 iterations) = 35 trillion FLOPs for training

Therefore, based on these assumptions, we estimate that training GPT-3 without searching online would require approximately 35 trillion FLOPs.

Try this prompt
Vote
2 / 17
02

AI Board Game Logicreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024svg
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023svg
Try this prompt
Vote
3 / 17
03

Logic Puzzlereasoning

Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024text

Let me help solve this word problem step by step.

Let's break it down:

  1. Sally is a girl
  2. Sally has 3 brothers
  3. Each brother has 2 sisters

The key insight here is that if each brother has 2 sisters, and we know Sally is one of those sisters, then all brothers must share the same sisters.

Since each brother has 2 sisters total, and we know Sally is one of them, there must be one other sister.

Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

To verify:

  • Sally + her 1 sister = 2 sisters total
  • This matches the fact that each of the 3 brothers has 2 sisters

The answer is 1 sister.

Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text

Sally has 2 sisters.

Try this prompt
Vote
4 / 17
04

Math Misconception Testreasoning

Tests an AI's understanding of number representation

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024text

Yes, 9.11 is greater than 9.9.

To understand why, let's look at these decimal numbers:

  • 9.11 = 9 + 11/100 = 9.110
  • 9.9 = 9 + 9/10 = 9.900

When comparing decimal numbers, we can add zeros after the decimal point without changing the value. When we write them both to the same number of decimal places (9.110 vs 9.900), it becomes clearer that 9.11 is greater than 9.9.

Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text

9.11 is less than 9.9.

Try this prompt
Vote
5 / 17
05

Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis

Tests an AI's randomness and creativity

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024text
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
6 / 17
06

SVG Layout Challengeimage generation

Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024svg
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023svg
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
Sponsored
7 / 17
07

Minimalist Landing Pageweb design

Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024website
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Try this prompt
Vote
8 / 17
08

Pokémon Battle UI Recreationweb design

Recreate an interactive, nostalgic Pokémon battle UI in a single HTML file.

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
9 / 17
09

Linear App Cloneweb design

Tests an AI's ability to replicate an existing UI with Tailwind CSS

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
10 / 17
10

Framer-Style Animationweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create smooth web animations

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
11 / 17
11

Dark Mode Dashboardweb design

Tests an AI's UI design skills with theming support

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
12 / 17
12

Interactive Catan Boardweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Anthropic · Jun 2024website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote

This matchup has more rounds

5+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy

Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
PaLM 2 Chat
PaLM 2 ChatRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

PaLM 2 Chat is 30x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
94%

PaLM 2 Chat uses 10.0x more bold

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
PaLM 2 Chat
66%Vocabulary63%
74wSentence Length16w
0.72Hedging0.77
0.3Bold3.4
8.9Lists1.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.06Headings0.07
0.09Transitions0.27
Based on 21 + 9 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)PaLM 2 Chat

Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.

178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.

Model Similarity Index

185x

price gap between models that write identically

178

models

12

clone pairs

32

dimensions

Devstral M / S
95.7%
Qwen3 Coder / Flash
95.6%
GPT-5.4 / Mini
93.3%
Read the full reportor download the 14-slide PDF

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
Download the free previewor get all 58 slides for $49
FAQ

Common questions

Keep going
PaLM 2 Chat logoLlama 4 Maverick logo

We compare AI models for a living. On purpose. We chose this.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Find Your Model
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Best AI For...
  • Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • Research
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor a Model
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built at hours no one should be awake, on hardware we don't own
PaLM 2 Chat vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
PaLM 2 Chat logoGPT-5 logo
PaLM 2 Chat vs GPT-5New provider
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs MiniMax M2.5New provider