Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 8K, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Llama 4 Maverick and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 1000K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Llama 4 Maverick is made by meta while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. Llama 4 Maverick has a 1000K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
PaLM 2 Chat is cheaper on both — 3.0× input, 5.0× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Llama 4 Maverick uses 10.3x more headings
Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 8K, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Llama 4 Maverick and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 1000K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Llama 4 Maverick is made by meta while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. Llama 4 Maverick has a 1000K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
PaLM 2 Chat is cheaper on both — 3.0× input, 5.0× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Llama 4 Maverick uses 10.3x more headings