Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsGLM 4 32B
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet at $0.1/M vs $6/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet | GLM 4 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $6/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $30/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
GLM 4 32B
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
GLM 4 32B costs 300x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
60× cheaper
Output
$0.10
300× cheaper
GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 60× input, 300× output.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
41%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 4.7x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
GLM 4 32B
62%Vocabulary55%
51wSentence Length15w
0.62Hedging0.74
2.0Bold4.9
4.1Lists3.8
0.00Emoji0.00
1.63Headings0.35
0.17Transitions0.04
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-5New provider
GLM 4 32B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Sonoma Dusk AlphaNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Sonoma Sky AlphaNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs TNG R1T ChimeraNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Trinity Large PreviewNew provider