Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GPT-4o (Omni)
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, in 5 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
GPT-4o (Omni)Runner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 5 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Image Generation. GPT-4o (Omni) is 3.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
GPT-4o (Omni)
Input
$2.50
2.4× cheaper
Output
$10.00
3.0× cheaper
GPT-4o (Omni) is cheaper on both — 2.4× input, 3.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
67%
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
GPT-4o (Omni)
61%Vocabulary54%
49wSentence Length18w
0.64Hedging0.72
2.2Bold7.3
4.5Lists5.6
0.00Emoji0.03
1.81Headings1.40
0.21Transitions0.26
Based on 21 + 24 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
