Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs MiniMax M1

Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 26 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet or MiniMax M1?

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and MiniMax M1 are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and MiniMax M1

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is made by anthropic while MiniMax M1 is from minimax. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to MiniMax M1's 1000K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1.

Our Verdict
MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

MiniMax M1 is 18x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

MiniMax M1 uses 10.4x more emoji

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
MiniMax M1
61%Vocabulary53%
49wSentence Length17w
0.64Hedging0.51
2.2Bold7.4
4.5Lists6.2
0.00Emoji0.10
1.81Headings0.86
0.21Transitions0.03
Based on 21 + 14 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetMiniMax M1

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions