Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, in 4 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 75% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 33K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
Qwen3 235B A22BRunner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 4 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 75% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input
—
Output
—
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
39%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 63.7x more hedging
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Qwen3 235B A22B
61%Vocabulary68%
49wSentence Length9w
0.64Hedging0.00
2.2Bold5.8
4.5Lists3.7
0.00Emoji0.74
1.81Headings0.00
0.21Transitions0.12
Based on 21 + 2 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
