Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Updated Sep 2026

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet at $2/M vs $6/M input tokens.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecClaude 3.7 Thinking SonnetQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price$6/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$30/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window200K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 3 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet632 words
How Large Language Models Work: Three Tailored Explanations For an Experienced Software Engineer What makes LLMs fascinating from a systems perspective is that they're essentially massive distributed computing graphs that learn to compress and reconstitute information through backpropagation.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1,046 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a lossy compression function trained on a massive corpus. During training, you're essentially building a statistical model of "given this sequence of tokens, what's the probability distribution over the next token?"
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet616 words
Collaborative Document Editor: Architecture Review Failure Modes Analysis WebSocket Connection Failures Issue: Client connections can fail due to network issues or server restarts, causing lost updates.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)477 words
Architecture Failure Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues (Data Loss / Correctness) Last-Write-Wins with Client Clocks — Fundamental Data Loss Problem: Client clocks are unreliable. They drift, can be manually set, and differ across timezones.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet374 words
Analysis: The 3 Weakest Claims in MindMeld AI's Pitch Deck "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim makes a scientifically impossible promise.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)582 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch The TAM Claim: "$180B" (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is a textbook case of TAM inflation that immediately undermines credibility with any experienced investor.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs 5.0x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input
$2.00
3.0× cheaper
Output
$6.00
5.0× cheaper

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is cheaper on both: 3.0× input, 5.0× output.

Where to run it

1 host

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is developed by Qwen. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is $4.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoHy3 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoGLM 5.3 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude 3.7 Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 SonnetVersion compare
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoClaude Opus 4.5 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 4.5Cross-provider
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 4.6Cross-provider
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoClaude Opus 4.7 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 4.7Cross-provider
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoClaude Opus 4.8 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 4.8Cross-provider

Model pages

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet59 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed