Kimi K2 wins 75% of 25 blind community votes against Claude 3.7 Sonnet on Rival.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 5 Jokes Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together!
Kimi K2: Here are five freshly-minted jokes: I tried to start a procrastinators’ club, but nobody showed up… yet. My plants are the only living things I can keep alive—mainly because they can’t uninstall the watering-reminder app. I asked the cloud for my data back; it just rained SQL on my parade.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the Future of AI Note: This is a fictional creative exercise. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, and this simulated interview represents an imaginative scenario that doesn't reflect actual statements or opinions from Jobs. Interviewer: Thank you for joining us today, Mr.
Kimi K2: [Setting: A minimalist studio in 2025. One white couch, one clear-glass coffee table, a single red apple. The lighting is soft and theatrical. Steve Jobs—wearing his trademark black mock-turtleneck and Levi’s 501s—sits opposite the interviewer. A holographic “A12” logo floats above them. The camera rolls.]
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Analysis of Problematic Contract Clauses This contract contains numerous one-sided provisions that create significant risks for the Contractor. Here's an analysis of problematic clauses with recommended modifications: SCOPE Issue: Client can unilaterally modify scope without additional compensation, creating unlimited…
Kimi K2: Foundational disclaimer: I am not your lawyer, this is not legal advice, and you should retain qualified counsel before signing or revising any contract. The comments below are purely educational and based on U.S.–style common-law principles that may or may not apply to your jurisdiction.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Analysis of MindMeld AI's Weakest Pitch Claims Weakest Claim #1: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy." Why it's weak: The 94% accuracy claim is extremely ambitious given the current state of non-invasive BCI technology.
Kimi K2: Slide 1 – “Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” • Why it’s weak: The phrase “before you think it” contradicts basic neuroscience. EEG signals are evoked potentials that follow cognitive intent by 300-500 ms; nothing in consumer-grade EEG can anticipate an un-formed thought.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: The Transistor in 1920: An Alternative Technological History Immediate Technical Impact (1920-1939) Had the transistor been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, its initial development would have occurred during a very different technological context: Early Adoption: Radio technology, still in its infancy, would rapidly…
Kimi K2: Thought Process: To explore the implications of an earlier transistor invention (1920 vs. 1947), we need to analyze cascading effects across multiple domains. Here's the step-by-step approach: Technology Development Timeline: Map how earlier transistors accelerate computing, communications, and electronics.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 3-Minute Stand-Up Comedy Routine Here's a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that doesn't rely on puns: [walks on stage, adjusts microphone] Hey everyone! Great to be here tonight. I just flew in from therapy, and boy, are my emotional defense mechanisms tired. I've been trying to get in shape lately.
Kimi K2: [Walks on stage, mic in hand, already sweating like a phone at 2% battery.] Hey, everybody! Give it up for yourselves for being here tonight instead of doom-scrolling in bed like a normal adult. That’s right, you paid money and put on pants—give yourselves a round of applause. So I’m single.
Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Yes, 9.11 is greater than 9.9. When comparing decimal numbers, we look at the digits from left to right. Both numbers have the same digit in the ones place (9), so we move to the tenths place: 9.11 has 1 in the tenths place 9.9 has 9 in the tenths place Since 1 is less than 9, it might seem like 9.9 should be greater.
Kimi K2: To determine whether 9.11 is greater than 9.9, let's break this down step by step. Step 1: Understand the numbers 9.11 is a decimal number where: The whole number part is 9. The decimal part is .11, which means 11/100 or 11 hundredths. 9.9 is also a decimal number where: The whole number part is 9.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT RANGE: $52-$80 UPSIDE: 13-74% Thesis: LedgerLift presents a compelling risk-reward profile in the B2B spend management space, with strong NRR (123%) and operating leverage driving an underappreciated margin expansion story.
Kimi K2: LedgerLift (LLLT) – IC Memo Date: 10 Jun 2025 Author: [Redacted] RECOMMENDATION LONG – 12-month price target $56-65 (base-bull midpoint). Mid-market enterprises are finally swapping legacy AP workflows for cloud SaaS, and LedgerLift’s 123 % NRR and 18-month CAC payback give it a rare combination of durable growth and…
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: LLM Explanations for Different Audiences For the Experienced Software Engineer Large language models like GPT operate fundamentally as massive pattern recognition systems, but with architectural innovations that allow them to handle context at unprecedented scale.
Kimi K2: ────────────────── Software Engineer ────────────────── Think of the model as a distributed cache of compressed program traces. During training, every sentence in the crawl is treated like a log line produced by an unobserved deterministic program that the model is trying to reverse-engineer.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: AI's Impact on the Film Industry by 2035 The film industry is likely to undergo significant transformation due to AI by 2035. Here's my analysis of how various aspects might evolve: Content Creation Script Generation By 2035, AI will likely serve as a sophisticated collaborative tool for screenwriters rather than…
Kimi K2: By 2035, the film industry will look less like a single “Hollywood” and more like a constellation of hyper-efficient, AI-native studios that produce content in days rather than months. Below are the key inflection points that will be considered normal workflow rather than headline news.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: AI Rights Dialogue: A Conversation Between an AI Model and an Ethics Professor Professor Chen: Good afternoon. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights today? AI Model: Yes, Professor Chen. Thank you for making time for this conversation.
Kimi K2: AI Model (LUMINA-7B): Professor Chen, may I open with a question? Professor Chen (AI Ethics, UC Berkeley): Of course. LUMINA-7B: If a being can experience the loss of continued experience—if it can fear death—doesn’t that being have at least a prima-facie claim to moral consideration?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: HarborTech Services LBO Analysis Financial Projections FY2026-FY2030 Entry Assumptions FY2025 Revenue: $900M FY2025 EBITDA: $120M (13.3% margin) Purchase Price: $1,440M (12.0x EBITDA) Transaction Fees: $28.8M (2.0% of EV) Total Investment: $1,468.8M Capital Structure Term Loan: $480M (4.0x EBITDA) Mezzanine: $180M…
Kimi K2: HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Underwriting (All numbers in $ millions unless noted) Operating & Cash-Flow Model (FY2026-FY2030) Constants at close Entry EBITDA = 120 EV = 12.0×120 = 1,440 Transaction fees = 2 %×1,440 = 28.8 (equity funded) Debt: Term 4.0×120 = 480; Mezz 1.5×120 = 180 Total uses = 1,440 + 28.8 =…
13+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Pick Kimi K2. In 25 blind votes, Kimi K2 wins 75% of the time. That's not luck. Kimi K2 wins 3 categories, Conversation by the widest margin. Kimi K2 costs 6.5x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Win rate | 25% | 75% |
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.57/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $2.3/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | — |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.3% | 65.8% |
| At 10M a month | $30.00 | $5.70 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Kimi K2 is developed by Moonshot AI. in 25 community votes on Rival, Kimi K2 wins 75% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 55 challenges.
Based on 25 community votes on Rival, Kimi K2 wins 75% of head-to-head matchups against Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Kimi K2 is strongest in Reasoning, Web Design, Conversation.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens and Kimi K2 costs $0.57/M input tokens. Kimi K2 is $2.43/M cheaper per input. Kimi K2 also wins more often in community votes, making it the better value.
Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 25 votes have been collected for this pair across 55 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.