Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 8K, tested across 21 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 200K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
PaLM 2 Chat is cheaper on both — 6.0× input, 30× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 30x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 24.8x more headings
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 8K, tested across 21 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and PaLM 2 Chat are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 200K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat.
PaLM 2 Chat is cheaper on both — 6.0× input, 30× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
PaLM 2 Chat is 30x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 24.8x more headings