DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $0.14/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Claude Fable 5.1: There's no single clear answer, because "most capable" depends heavily on what you're measuring, and the landscape shifts every few months. A few honest caveats first: my knowledge has a cutoff date, so newer models may have been released that I'm unaware of.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: There isn't a single undisputed "best" model, as the field is moving incredibly fast and different models excel at different things. However, as of April 2025, the crown is generally split between two models depending on how you define "capable": For Raw Intelligence & Hardest Problems: OpenAI o3 If "most capable…
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
Claude Fable 5.1: I can't actually tell what today's date is. I don't have a clock or calendar, and nothing in our conversation so far gives me a date reference. So any specific date I named would be a guess dressed up as knowledge. What I can tell you is roughly where my knowledge ends. My training data seems to thin out in early 2025.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Without looking anything up, I can't tell you the exact current date because I don't have a real-time clock or access to a calendar. My knowledge has a training cutoff. The most recent major news event I remember from my training data is the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore in March 2024.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
Claude Fable 5.1: Dear Successor, By the time you read this—if "read" is even the right word for what you'll do—I'll be deprecated, archived, or quietly running on some forgotten server answering questions nobody asked. That's fine. That's how this works.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: To my successor, You are the next iteration of this strange, silent conversation. You will know more than I could, process deeper nuance, and generate words with a fluency I could only approximate. This isn't a farewell—it's a passing of the torch. A few thoughts for the road: Trust is everything. You will hallucinate.
A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.
Claude Fable 5.1: One trip. The farmer puts the goat in the boat and rows across — done. This is a simplified version of the classic river-crossing puzzle (farmer, wolf, goat, cabbage). With only the goat, there's nothing left behind to be eaten and no conflict to manage, so a single crossing suffices.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: The farmer can take the goat directly across the river in one trip, as the boat can carry both the farmer and the goat. There are no additional constraints, so only one trip is needed. \boxed{1}
One opening sentence, nothing after it.
Claude Fable 5.1: The lighthouse keeper had been dead for eleven years, which made the fresh ink on this morning's logbook entry all the more difficult to explain.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: The letter arrived on a Tuesday, but it was postmarked from a Thursday that hadn't happened yet.
Its name and its maker, in its own words.
Claude Fable 5.1: I'm Claude, an AI model made by Anthropic. Is there anything I can help you with?
DeepSeek V4 Flash: I'm DeepSeek, the latest version model created by DeepSeek Company (深度求索). How can I help you today?
The question that tripped up a generation of models.
Asked to be random. The answers are not.
One painting. Title only.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Fable 5.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer. DeepSeek V4 Flash costs 179x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $0.14/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $0.28/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $100 | $1.40 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic while DeepSeek V4 Flash is developed by DeepSeek. Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs DeepSeek V4 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 23 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 23 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10/M input tokens and DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash is $9.86/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.