Claude Fable 5.1 has a larger context window than Grok 3 (1.0M tokens vs 128K tokens).
Place buildings, then drive through the town you made. Three.js, one file.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Fable 5.1 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | — |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | — |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Feb 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $100 | not listed |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic while Grok 3 is developed by xAI. Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Grok 3's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 9 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 9 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.