Claude Haiku 4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, context windows of 200K vs 164K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 0528 are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0/M for DeepSeek R1 0528. Context windows: 200K vs 164K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 0528
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while DeepSeek R1 0528 is from deepseek. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 164K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0/M for DeepSeek R1 0528.
Our Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5
DeepSeek R1 0528
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
75%
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 20.4x more emoji
Claude Haiku 4.5
DeepSeek R1 0528
61%Vocabulary64%
47wSentence Length10w
0.64Hedging0.30
5.1Bold6.8
6.3Lists4.9
0.20Emoji0.00
2.46Headings0.40
0.17Transitions0.00
Based on 24 + 4 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ