Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 33K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B are both competitive models. Context windows: 200K vs 33K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B

Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while Qwen3 235B A22B is from qwen. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K.

Our Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen3 235B A22B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
76%

Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 64.1x more hedging

Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen3 235B A22B
61%Vocabulary68%
47wSentence Length9w
0.64Hedging0.00
5.1Bold5.8
6.3Lists3.7
0.20Emoji0.74
2.46Headings0.00
0.17Transitions0.12
Based on 24 + 2 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions