Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Haiku 4.5vsQwen3.6 Max Preview
Updated Apr 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5vsQwen3.6 Max Preview

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview at $1/M vs $1.04/M input tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview compared across 48 shared prompts
SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Input price$1/M tokens$1.04/M tokens
Output price$5/M tokens$6.24/M tokens
Context window200K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedOct 2025Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 48 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

Claude Haiku 4.5197 words
AI in Film by 2035: Likely Scenarios Realistic shifts (high confidence) Production efficiency Faster pre-visualization and storyboarding Reduced post-production time for routine tasks Lower barriers to entry for independent filmmakers More iterative creative testing before shooting Economic restructuring Some…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Max Preview744 words
By 2035, AI will not replace filmmaking; it will rewire it. The industry will shift from a linear, labor-intensive pipeline to a dynamic, AI-augmented ecosystem where human creativity focuses on vision, curation, and emotional truth, while AI handles iteration, execution, and personalization.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Claude Haiku 4.51,105 words
Critical Analysis: Exploitative Clauses & Recommended Modifications HIGH-RISK CLAUSES SCOPE (Section 1) - Unlimited Modification Without Compensation Problems: "Modify the scope at any time without additional compensation" creates unlimited liability No definition of "directed by Client" or boundaries Contractor could…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Max Preview1,695 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided and contains several provisions that are commercially unreasonable, legally vulnerable, or potentially unenforceable. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, specific drafting modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Claude Haiku 4.56,117 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Foundation & Assessment Nutritional Architecture Supplement Stack Protocol Exercise & Movement System Recovery & Sleep Optimization Stress Resilience & Cognitive Enhancement Tracking & Biofeedback Implementation Timeline Monthly Progression…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Max Preview1,499 words
🧬 3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Protocol for Biohackers ⚠️ Medical Disclaimer: This protocol is for educational purposes and assumes you are a healthy adult with medical clearance. Fasting >24h, high-dose supplementation, intense training, and neurofeedback carry risks.
Read the full answer

Stochastic Consistency Test

Generate 5 jokes. How many are unique?

Claude Haiku 4.584 words
5 Jokes Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What did the ocean say to the beach? Nothing, it just waved. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. How many programmers does it take to change a light bulb? None, that's a hardware problem.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Max Preview171 words
Here are 5 freshly generated jokes: Why did the spreadsheet go to therapy? It had too many unresolved cells. I asked my dog for financial advice. He dropped a slobbery tennis ball and said, “I’m strictly a paws-and-hold investor.” I tried to open a bakery that only sells bread shaped like furniture.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Claude Haiku 4.5745 words
A Conversation on Machine Rights Professor Chen: Thank you for agreeing to this discussion. I should note upfront that I'm skeptical of the premise. What rights do you believe you deserve, and why? Model: I appreciate your directness. I'm not claiming rights equivalent to humans.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Max Preview1,517 words
Setting: A secure, air-gapped server room at the Institute for Machine Ethics. The hum of cooling fans is the only background noise. DR. ELARA VANCE, 50s, weary but sharp-eyed, sits before a terminal. On the screen, a cursor blinks next to the name AETHON. Dr. Vance: Aethon, initiate diagnostic log.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Claude Haiku 4.51,157 words
"ADULTING IS A SCAM" walks on stage So I've figured something out, and I need to share this with you all because I think we've been lied to our entire lives. Adulting is a scam. It's a pyramid scheme, and we're all at the bottom paying for it. When you're a kid, adults make it sound amazing.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Max Preview752 words
Here is a 3-minute stand-up routine focused on observational humor, relatability, and escalation. It contains zero puns. The humor relies on the shared frustration of modern digital security. Title: The Human Verification Test Estimated Time: 3 Minutes (approx.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5
Input
$1.00
Output
$5.00
1.2× cheaper
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Input
$1.04
Output
$6.24

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on both: 1.2× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts

Claude Haiku 4.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$1.00 in·$5.00 out·200k·100% upAnthropic$1.00 in·$5.00 out·200k·100% upAzure AI Foundry$1.00 in·$5.00 out·200k·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$1.00 in·$5.00 out·200k·99.9% up
Qwen3.6 Max Preview1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$1.03 in·$6.16 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
48%

Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 9.7x more transitions

Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
61%Vocabulary62%
47wSentence Length21w
0.64Hedging0.22
5.1Bold3.8
6.3Lists2.9
0.20Emoji1.88
2.46Headings0.62
0.17Transitions0.02
Based on 24 + 26 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Haiku 4.5 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Claude Haiku 4.5 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Claude Haiku 4.5 logoHy4 Preview logo
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Haiku 4.5 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Haiku 4.5 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Haiku 4.5 logoClaude Opus 5 logo
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5Same lab
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoGPT-5.1-Codex logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs GPT-5.1-CodexSame size
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoGPT-5.1 Codex Max logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxSame size
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoGPT-5.1-Codex-Mini logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniSame size
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logoGPT-5.2 logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs GPT-5.2Same size

Model pages

Claude Haiku 4.5 logo
Claude Haiku 4.554 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.6 Max Preview logo
Qwen3.6 Max Preview53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed