Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek R1 0528

Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, in 3 community votes, claude opus 4.1 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 164K, tested across 27 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 3 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0/M for DeepSeek R1 0528. Context windows: 200K vs 164K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek R1 0528

Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while DeepSeek R1 0528 is from deepseek. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 164K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0/M for DeepSeek R1 0528. In community voting, In 3 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.

In 3 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 3+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Image Generation: Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek R1 0528 are tied
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1Winner
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528Runner-up

Pick Claude Opus 4.1. In 3 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
75%

Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji

Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek R1 0528
61%Vocabulary64%
87wSentence Length10w
0.54Hedging0.30
5.1Bold6.8
6.7Lists4.9
0.38Emoji0.00
1.68Headings0.40
0.13Transitions0.00
Based on 17 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4.1DeepSeek R1 0528

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions