Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 200K vs 10.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 200K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 60× input, 150× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 150x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 200K vs 10.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 200K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 60× input, 150× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 150x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji