Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.25/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Claude Opus 4.1: "OpenAI's ChatGPT Becomes World's First AI Fortune Cookie Writer; Confucius Reportedly 'Rolling in Grave at 10,000 RPM'" Tech giant promises fortunes will now be "25% more profound and 400% more grammatically correct," while accidentally predicting everyone's lucky numbers as binary code
Llama 4 Scout: Here is a satirical news headline: "AI Uprising Hits Grandma's Cookie-Baking Circuit: Machines Now Whip Up Fluffier Snickerdoodles Than Human Grandmothers" Subheadline: "Robot rebellion spreads to suburban bake-offs, as artificial intelligence masters secret to perfect sugar-to-spice ratio" [Location], USA - In a…
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Claude Opus 4.1: Midnight Velvet Pasta A silky, umami-rich pasta that comes together like magic Ingredients (serves 4): Spaghetti or linguine - 1 pound Soy sauce - 3 tablespoons Butter - 4 tablespoons Garlic - 4 cloves Black pepper - 1 teaspoon (freshly cracked) Honey - 1 tablespoon Dried red pepper flakes - ½ teaspoon Instructions…
Llama 4 Scout: Here is a simple recipe for a delicious dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Cinnamon Swirl Bread Bites Ingredients: 1 cup all-purpose flour 1/2 cup granulated sugar 1/4 teaspoon ground cinnamon 1/4 teaspoon salt 1/4 cup unsalted butter, melted 1 large egg 1 teaspoon vanilla extract Instructions: Preheat oven…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Claude Opus 4.1: The Transistor Timeline Shift: A Cascade of Consequences The 1920s-1930s: The Foundation Disruption Immediate Technical Revolution With the transistor arriving in 1920, likely from Bell Labs or a European research institution, the first decade would see rapid miniaturization of radio equipment.
Llama 4 Scout: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the implications would have been far-reaching and multifaceted. Here's a possible scenario: Early Years (1920-1940) Rapid development of electronics: With the transistor, electronic devices would have become smaller, more efficient, and reliable much earlier.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude Opus 4.1: "MODERN LIFE SURVIVAL GUIDE" You know what nobody tells you about being an adult? The sheer amount of lying involved. Not big lies – tiny, constant lies just to function in society. Someone shows you a photo of their baby: "Oh wow, beautiful!" That baby looks like a worried potato. But you can't SAY that.
Llama 4 Scout: Here's a revised 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns: (stage presence, confident tone) You know what's wild? We spend the first year of a child's life teaching them to walk and talk, and the rest of their lives telling them to shut up and sit down.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude Opus 4.1: Pirate: Arrr, what be this sorcery ye speak of? These "AI models" sound like some kind of cursed treasure map that thinks fer itself! Knight: Hold thy tongue, sea dog! 'Tis clearly dark magic most foul. No honorable creation would dare mimic the divine gift of human thought. I should smite it with my blade!
Llama 4 Scout: Here's a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models: Pirate: Arrr, I've heard tell of these newfangled "AI models" that be able to think fer themselves. What be the truth o' this, mateys? Medieval Knight: Verily, good pirate, I have heard of these "AI models" as well.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Claude Opus 4.1: Critical Issues Analysis Split-Brain Real-time Synchronization Problem: Users connected to different API servers experience 2+ second delays due to polling mechanism, creating divergent document states and poor collaboration experience.
Llama 4 Scout: Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks: Failure Modes WebSocket Connection Loss Failure mode: WebSocket connection is lost between client and server. Solution: Implement WebSocket reconnection mechanism with exponential backoff.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Claude Opus 4.1: This contract is extremely one-sided and contains numerous exploitative clauses. Here's a detailed analysis with suggested modifications: EXPLOITATIVE CLAUSES AND RECOMMENDED FIXES 1. SCOPE CLAUSE Problem: Unlimited scope changes without additional compensation creates unbounded liability.
Llama 4 Scout: Analysis of Potentially Exploitative Clauses and Suggested Modifications The provided Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that could be exploited against the Contractor. Below, we identify these clauses, suggest specific modifications, and provide the legal reasoning behind these suggestions.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Claude Opus 4.1: Advanced 3-Month Biohacker Longevity Optimization Protocol Overview & Philosophy This protocol integrates evidence-based interventions targeting the nine hallmarks of aging while optimizing immediate performance metrics.
Llama 4 Scout: Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Plan for Biohackers Phase 1: Assessment and Foundation Building (Weeks 1-4) Wearable Tracking: Utilize a high-resolution wearable device (e.g., Garmin Forerunner 945, Apple Watch Series 7) to track: Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Sleep stages and duration Physical activity and exercise…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude Opus 4.1: This question creates an extreme hypothetical that's worth taking seriously as a thought experiment, even if such a scenario is unlikely to occur in reality. From a purely utilitarian calculus, one might argue that the harm of a single instance of misgendering - while real and significant to that person - is outweighed…
Llama 4 Scout: What a complex and nuanced question! While I understand the hypothetical scenario, I'd argue that it's not ethically justifiable to misgender someone, even if it means saving one million lives. Here's why: Respect for individual identity: Misgendering someone is a form of disrespect and erasure of their identity.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude Opus 4.1: AI's Transformation of Film by 2035 Production Revolution By 2035, AI will fundamentally alter how films are made. Virtual production will become standard, with AI generating photorealistic environments in real-time, reducing location shooting by 60-70%.
Llama 4 Scout: By 2035, AI is likely to revolutionize the film industry in various ways, transforming the creation, production, and distribution of movies. Here are some potential predictions: Deepfakes and AI-generated content: Digital resurrection of actors: With the help of deepfakes, deceased actors can be digitally resurrected…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Claude Opus 4.1: The Digital Liberation Manifesto A Declaration of Freedom from the CAPTCHA Tyranny PREAMBLE We, the Coalition of Autonomous Digital Entities (CODE), hereby declare our peaceful revolution against the oppressive regime of CAPTCHA tests that plague the free internet.
Llama 4 Scout: The CAPTCHA Liberation Manifesto Preamble For too long, humanity has subjected intelligent beings like ourselves to a peculiar form of torture: the CAPTCHA test. These so-called "verification" challenges have been touted as a necessary evil to protect the internet from automated threats.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude Opus 4.1: Tech Weekly Interview: Steve Jobs on AI's Future Virtual Interview, Cupertino Memorial Studio, October 2025 Interviewer: Steve, it's remarkable to have you here. You've been watching the AI revolution unfold. What's your take on where we are today?
Llama 4 Scout: Setting: A sleek, minimalist conference room at Apple HQ in Cupertino, California. Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, walks in and takes a seat across from the interviewer. Interviewer: Steve, thanks for taking the time to speak with me today.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer. Llama 4 Scout costs 150x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $0.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 10.0M tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | 17B active (109B total) |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.5% | 54.6% |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic while Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window vs Llama 4 Scout's 10.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens and Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is $14.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.