Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Mistral Nemo by Mistral AI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Nemo are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Mistral Nemo is from mistral. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to Mistral Nemo's 128K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo.
Mistral Nemo is cheaper on both — 500× input, 1071× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Mistral Nemo is 1071x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Mistral Nemo by Mistral AI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Nemo are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Mistral Nemo is from mistral. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to Mistral Nemo's 128K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo.
Mistral Nemo is cheaper on both — 500× input, 1071× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Mistral Nemo is 1071x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji