GPT-5 vs Mistral Nemo
Compare GPT-5 by OpenAI against Mistral Nemo by Mistral AI, in 5 community votes, gpt-5 wins 75% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 400K vs 128K, tested across 51 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5 or Mistral Nemo?
GPT-5 is the better choice overall, winning 75% of 5 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo. Context windows: 400K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5 and Mistral Nemo
GPT-5 is made by openai while Mistral Nemo is from mistral. GPT-5 has a 400K token context window compared to Mistral Nemo's 128K. On pricing, GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo. In community voting, In 5 community votes, GPT-5 wins 75% of head-to-head duels.
In 5 community votes, GPT-5 wins 75% of head-to-head duels. GPT-5 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 5+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Mistral Nemo is cheaper on both — 42× input, 143× output
Pick GPT-5. In 5 blind votes, GPT-5 wins 75% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT-5 particularly excels in Image Generation. Mistral Nemo is 143x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
GPT-5 uses 16.2x more headings
