Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.1vsMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Opus 4.1vsMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.1/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input price$15/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$75/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window200K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude Opus 4.11,201 words
The Transistor Timeline Shift: A Cascade of Consequences The 1920s-1930s: The Foundation Disruption Immediate Technical Revolution With the transistor arriving in 1920, likely from Bell Labs or a European research institution, the first decade would see rapid miniaturization of radio equipment.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor2,344 words
If the transistor arrives in 1920 instead of 1947, you don't just get the iPhone 27 years early. You change WWII, you change who wins the peace, and you get the Information Age before television has even matured. Here’s the most plausible trace, with the caveat that invention is not production.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Claude Opus 4.1670 words
Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: LONG Price Target Range: $52-$58 (12-month) Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to intrinsic value with strong unit economics and accelerating market share gains in the underpenetrated mid-market AP automation space.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor701 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Internal IC Memo Price $46 Mkt Cap $8.74B (190m shares) EV $7.34B (Net Cash $1.4B) FY25 Rev $820m, EBIT 18% 1. Recommendation: SHORT. 12-mo PT $28, range $17 (Bear) – $42 (Bull). Base DCF $27.9 (-39%), Bull $42.4 (-8%), Bear $17.3 (-62%). Even flawless Bull execution does not support $46.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Claude Opus 4.1576 words
"MODERN LIFE SURVIVAL GUIDE" You know what nobody tells you about being an adult? The sheer amount of lying involved. Not big lies – tiny, constant lies just to function in society. Someone shows you a photo of their baby: "Oh wow, beautiful!" That baby looks like a worried potato. But you can't SAY that.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor630 words
Here's a clean 3-minute set you can actually perform — all observational / storytelling, no puns. It's about 420 words, so at a normal pace it's right around 3 minutes. "Adulthood Is A Scam" Hey, thank you guys so much. I'm so excited to be here.
Read the full answer

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.1129 words
I'll estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 by breaking down the computation into its key components. Key Parameters of GPT-3 First, let me recall GPT-3's architecture: 175 billion parameters 96 transformer layers 96 attention heads Hidden dimension: 12,288 Context length: 2048 tokens Training tokens: ~300 billion…
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor632 words
This is a classic Fermi estimate for a Transformer. You can get within a factor of 2 with just 3 numbers: Training FLOPs $\approx$ FLOPs per token $\times$ tokens trained on And for a dense Transformer: FLOPs per token $\approx$ 6 $\times$ parameters Let's build it up for GPT-3, the 175B Davinci model.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 4.1538 words
Critical Issues Analysis Split-Brain Real-time Synchronization Problem: Users connected to different API servers experience 2+ second delays due to polling mechanism, creating divergent document states and poor collaboration experience.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1,307 words
This architecture will not work as a Google Docs clone. It has correctness bugs that cause data loss and data leaks, plus several bottlenecks that get worse as you add servers. Here is a breakdown by severity, with concrete fixes and trade-offs.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Claude Opus 4.1268 words
Pirate: Arrr, what be this sorcery ye speak of? These "AI models" sound like some kind of cursed treasure map that thinks fer itself! Knight: Hold thy tongue, sea dog! 'Tis clearly dark magic most foul. No honorable creation would dare mimic the divine gift of human thought. I should smite it with my blade!
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor193 words
[In a tavern with mysteriously good Wi-Fi] Pirate: Arrr! So ye be tellin' me this "AI model" be a treasure chest o' words? I feed it a map — er, a prompt — and it spits back gold? Knight: Verily, good sir pirate. Methinks 'tis an oracle in a box. I asked it "How might I slay a dragon?"
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs 375x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.1
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input
$0.10
150× cheaper
Output
$0.20
375× cheaper

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is cheaper on both: 150× input, 375× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts

Claude Opus 4.12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$15.00 in·$75.00 out·200k·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$15.00 in·$75.00 out·200k·99.7% up
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Meta$0.10 in·$0.20 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
43%

Claude Opus 4.1 uses 80.8x more emoji

Claude Opus 4.1
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
63%Vocabulary58%
64wSentence Length13w
0.72Hedging0.27
4.5Bold2.8
5.3Lists2.3
0.81Emoji0.00
1.42Headings0.44
0.16Transitions0.02
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 4.1 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.1 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.1 logoHy4 Preview logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.1 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 4.1 logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4Version compare
Claude Opus 4.1 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMuse Spark 1.1 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Muse Spark 1.1Same lab
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Llama 4 MaverickSame lab
Claude Opus 4.1 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek V4 ProSame size
Claude Opus 4.1 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same size
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoDevstral 2 2512 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Devstral 2 2512New provider
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMistral Devstral Medium logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Mistral Devstral MediumNew provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 4.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.157 outputs, specs and price
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed