Claude Opus 4.1vsQwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.1612/M vs $15/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.1 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.1612/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $0.9653/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Apr 2026 |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3.6 35B A3BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B takes Web Design. Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 78x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.1
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
93× cheaper
Output
$0.97
78× cheaper
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper on both: 93× input, 78× output.
Where to run it
12 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
54%
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 4.3x more sentence length
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
63%Vocabulary59%
64wSentence Length15w
0.72Hedging0.31
4.5Bold4.9
5.3Lists2.7
0.81Emoji1.60
1.42Headings0.75
0.16Transitions0.05
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs GPT-5.6 LunaNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs GPT-5.6 Luna ProNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs GPT-5.6 SolNew provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs GPT-5.6 TerraNew provider