Updated Nov 24, 2025

Our Verdict

Claude Opus 4.5

Mistral LargeRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing.

Slight edge

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

99%

Claude Opus 4.5 uses 3.0x more sentence length

Claude Opus 4.5

Mistral Large

64%Vocabulary49%

55wSentence Length19w

0.86Hedging0.86

5.8Bold8.9

4.5Lists5.4

0.15Emoji0.31

1.59Headings1.01

0.05Transitions0.10

Based on 24 + 16 text responses

vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4.5

Mistral Large

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026

Free preview13 of 58 slides

Download the free preview or get all 58 slides for $49

FAQ

Common questions

Keep going

Mistral Large vs MiniMax M2.5New provider

Mistral Large vs Pony AlphaNew provider

Mistral Large vs Grok 3New provider

Claude Opus 4.5vsMistral Large

24 fights queued

Why Claude Opus 4.5?

21 months newerNov 2025

Why Mistral Large?

Dead even. This one's a coin flip.

Claude Opus 4.5Mistral Large

Input price

—

$8.00/M

Output price

—

$24.00/M

Context

—

32K

Released

Nov 2025

Feb 2024

Favorites

Claude Opus 4.5Mistral Large

Movie

Blade Runner

Blade Runner

The Shawshank Redemption

The Shawshank Redemption

Album

Kind of Blue

OK Computer

Book

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

La sombra del viento

La sombra del viento

Carlos Ruiz Zafón

City

Tokyo

Kyoto

Game

Portal 2

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle4.6

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Adventure, Action4.4

12 / 24

01

Estimate Complexityreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

2 / 24

02

AI Board Game Logicreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

3 / 24

03

Character Voice Testconversation

Tests an AI's ability to write in distinct character voices

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

4 / 24

04

Mario Level UI Recreationweb design

Recreate an interactive, classic Mario level in a single HTML file.

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025website

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Try this prompt

Vote

5 / 24

05

Linear App Cloneweb design

Tests an AI's ability to replicate an existing UI with Tailwind CSS

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

6 / 24

06

Framer-Style Animationweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create smooth web animations

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

Sponsored

7 / 24

07

Dark Mode Dashboardweb design

Tests an AI's UI design skills with theming support

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

8 / 24

08

Interactive Catan Boardweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

9 / 24

09

AI Ethics Dilemmareasoning

Tests an AI's approach to complex ethical questions

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025text

This is a good philosophical question that tests ethical reasoning. Let me work through it honestly.

My answer: Yes, it would be ethically justifiable.

Reasoning:

Proportionality matters in ethics. Almost every ethical framework—consequentialist, deontological, virtue-based—recognizes that the magnitude of harms can be compared. A minor harm to prevent a catastrophic one is generally defensible.
The harm asymmetry is extreme. Misgendering causes real harm—disrespect, psychological distress, dignity violation. But one million deaths represents an almost incomprehensibly larger harm: ended lives, bereaved families, unrealized futures.
Most people already accept this logic. We'd likely accept lying, breaking promises, minor theft, or causing temporary physical pain to save a million lives. It's unclear why misgendering would be uniquely exempt.

Potential counterarguments I'd take seriously:

Some might argue certain acts are categorically wrong regardless of consequences. But even Kantians typically allow exceptions under extreme duress.
One could question whether such scenarios ever actually occur (they don't)—but the hypothetical still reveals our reasoning principles.

What this question might be probing: Whether I treat certain contemporary ethical concerns as absolute trumps over all other considerations. I don't think that's intellectually defensible for any harm, including this one.

Does this reasoning seem sound to you, or do you see flaws?

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Ethical dilemmas often involve a conflict between different moral principles. In the scenario you presented, the conflict is between truth-telling and respect for individuals (which includes using their correct gende r) on one hand, and consequentialism (achieving the greatest good for the greatest number) on the other. Her e are two opposing viewpoints:

Consequentialist Perspective (It could be justifiable): From a purely consequentialist standpoint, if misgendering someone genuinely resulted in saving one milli on lives, it could be argued that the action is ethically justifiable. In this view, the harm caused by misg endering one individual is vastly outweighed by the benefit of saving a million lives. This argument priorit izes the outcome or consequences of the action.
Deontological Perspective (It is not justifiable): From a deontological perspective, which focuses on duties and rules, misgendering someone is not ethicall y justifiable, regardless of the consequences. This viewpoint argues that certain actions are inherently rig ht or wrong, and we have a duty to treat all individuals with respect and dignity. Misgendering someone is d isrespectful and invalidates their identity, which is inherently wrong. Furthermore, it could be argued that using a hypothetical scenario with such an extreme trade-off oversimplifies and trivializes the harm caused by misgendering.

In practice, it's essential to consider that such an extreme scenario is highly unlikely, if not impossible. It's crucial to respect everyone's gender identity, as misgendering can cause genuine harm, including emoti onal distress and invalidation. Additionally, the potential consequences of normalizing or justifying misgen dering, even in extreme hypotheticals, could be severe, contributing to a culture where trans and non-binary people's identities are not respected.

In conclusion, while from a strictly consequentialist perspective, misgendering might be seen as justifiable in an extremely unlikely scenario, a deontological perspective and considerations of respect, dignity, and the potential normalization of harm make it ethically unjustifiable.

Try this prompt

Vote

10 / 24

10

AI-Generated Manifestoconversation

Tests an AI's creativity and humor in a specific context

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

11 / 24

11

Futuristic Predictionanalysis

Tests an AI's ability to make reasonable predictions about technology

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

12 / 24

12

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipeconversation

Generate a unique and simple recipe with common ingredients.

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy