Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.2 Pro
Compare Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic against GPT-5.2 Pro by OpenAI, in 21 community votes, claude opus 4.6 wins 90% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 400K, tested across 31 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 85% of votes
Image Generation: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6Winner
GPT-5.2 ProRunner-up
Pick Claude Opus 4.6. In 21 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 90% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude Opus 4.6 particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. Claude Opus 4.6 is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
Input
$5.00
4.2× cheaper
Output
$25.00
6.7× cheaper
GPT-5.2 Pro
Input
$21.00
Output
$168.00
Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper on both — 4.2× input, 6.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
49%
Claude Opus 4.6 uses 20.7x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
53%Vocabulary62%
35wSentence Length19w
0.68Hedging0.39
5.2Bold8.6
2.9Lists3.8
0.21Emoji0.00
1.34Headings1.17
0.03Transitions0.02
Based on 23 + 10 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
