Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, in 12 community votes, claude opus 4.6 wins 73% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 28 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude Opus 4.6 is the better choice overall, winning 73% of 12 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 1000K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick

Claude Opus 4.6 is made by anthropic while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1000K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. In community voting, In 12 community votes, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 73% of head-to-head duels.

In 12 community votes, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 73% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4.6 leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 12+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Web Design: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 57% of votes
Image Generation: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6Winner
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 MaverickRunner-up

Pick Claude Opus 4.6. In 12 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 73% of the time. That's not luck.

Claude Opus 4.6 particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. Llama 4 Maverick is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Clear winner
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4.6Llama 4 Maverick
FAQ