Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B
Compare Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B by Qwen, in 6 community votes, claude opus 4.6 wins 60% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Reasoning: Claude Opus 4.6 wins 100% of votes
Web Design: Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6Winner
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27BRunner-up
Pick Claude Opus 4.6. In 6 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 60% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for Reasoning. Pick Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B for Web Design. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B
Input
$0.30
17× cheaper
Output
$2.40
10× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper on both — 17× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
46%
Claude Opus 4.6 uses 20.7x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.6
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B
53%Vocabulary51%
35wSentence Length15w
0.68Hedging0.32
5.2Bold7.3
2.9Lists4.8
0.21Emoji0.01
1.34Headings0.87
0.03Transitions0.19
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
