Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.6vsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Updated Apr 2026

Claude Opus 4.6vsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 compared across 51 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Input price$5/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$25/M tokens$2.4/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2026Apr 2026
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 10x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.6
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Input
$0.40
13× cheaper
Output
$2.40
10× cheaper

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is cheaper on both: 13× input, 10× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts

Claude Opus 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.9% upAzure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·97.2% upAnthropic$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.9% upGoogle Vertex AI$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-201 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.30 in·$1.80 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
61%

Claude Opus 4.6 uses 2.6x more hedging

Claude Opus 4.6
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
56%Vocabulary59%
33wSentence Length15w
0.73Hedging0.28
5.3Bold4.4
2.7Lists2.5
1.16Emoji1.53
1.23Headings0.76
0.02Transitions0.04
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Claude Opus 4.6 logoOx Alpha logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 4.6 logoGPT-5 logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5New provider
Claude Opus 4.6 logoMiniMax M3 logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Claude Opus 4.6 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Claude Opus 4.6 logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteNew provider
Claude Opus 4.6 logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewNew provider
Claude Opus 4.6 logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNew provider
Claude Opus 4.6 logoGemini 3.5 Flash logo
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed