Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Compare Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic against Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) by Meta AI, in 3 community votes, claude opus 4.7 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 52 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7Winner
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up
Pick Claude Opus 4.7. In 3 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is 32x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
8.5× cheaper
Output
$0.79
32× cheaper
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper on both — 8.5× input, 32× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
21%
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 86.2x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.7
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
64%Vocabulary51%
20wSentence Length18w
0.51Hedging0.46
4.6Bold3.4
3.8Lists5.6
0.86Emoji0.00
1.60Headings0.00
0.03Transitions0.06
Based on 27 + 15 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
