Claude Opus 4.7vsQwen3 Coder
Qwen3 Coder is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $0.22/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen3 Coder |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.22/M tokens |
| Output price | $25/M tokens | $0.95/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | — |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen3 CoderRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Coder costs 26x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen3 Coder
Input
$0.22
23× cheaper
Output
$0.95
26× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder is cheaper on both: 23× input, 26× output.
Where to run it
9 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
54%
Qwen3 Coder uses 4.9x more transitions
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen3 Coder
64%Vocabulary61%
20wSentence Length62w
0.51Hedging0.62
4.6Bold4.4
3.8Lists4.9
0.86Emoji0.37
1.60Headings1.31
0.03Transitions0.17
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
