Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Compare Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen: Qwen3 Max ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input
$1.20
4.2× cheaper
Output
$6.00
4.2× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking is cheaper on both — 4.2× input, 4.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
72%
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 2.2x more hedging
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
64%Vocabulary61%
20wSentence Length15w
0.51Hedging0.23
4.6Bold5.2
3.8Lists3.9
0.86Emoji1.37
1.60Headings1.22
0.03Transitions0.04
Based on 27 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
