Compare Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05. Context windows: 1000K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4.8 is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is from google. Claude Opus 4.8 has a 1000K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is cheaper on both — 4.0× input, 2.5× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Claude Opus 4.8 uses 77.6x more emoji
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05. Context windows: 1000K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4.8 is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is from google. Claude Opus 4.8 has a 1000K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is cheaper on both — 4.0× input, 2.5× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Claude Opus 4.8 uses 77.6x more emoji