Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.8vsQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Updated May 2026

Claude Opus 4.8vsQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) compared across 37 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.8Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input price$5/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$25/M tokens$4/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2026Sep 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 37 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 4.8196 words
Cinnamon Sugar Pull-Apart Bites A warm, gooey treat that tastes like a cinnamon roll but comes together in minutes! Ingredients (7 total) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tablespoon baking powder 1 teaspoon salt ¾ cup milk 4 tablespoons butter (melted, divided) ½ cup sugar 2 teaspoons ground cinnamon Instructions Preheat…
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)282 words
Crispy Chickpea Pantry Pasta Sweet or savory? Savory with a zesty kick! Total time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Why it works: Uses pantry staples to create a crunchy, garlicky, umami-packed meal with zero fresh produce needed. The chickpeas get incredibly crispy, and lemon juice (bottled) adds bright freshness.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Claude Opus 4.8259 words
Setting: A dimly lit tavern that exists outside of time. Three figures share a table. Pirate: So let me get this straight. Ye got a machine that thinks? Without a soul, without grog, without a beatin' heart? Hacker: (cracking knuckles) It doesn't think, exactly. It's pattern matching, dude.
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)489 words
The Tavern of Temporal Anomalies (A creaky tavern. SIR GALAHAD (polished armor, earnest face) sips mead. CAPTAIN BLACKBEARD (eye patch, parrot on shoulder) sharpens a cutlass. DEX "BYTE" MORALES (hoodie, neon-green sunglasses, tapping furiously on a glowing laptop) slurps a pixelated energy drink.)
Read the full answer

Satirical Fake News Headline

Generate a satirical news headline about AI taking over a completely unexpected industry.

Claude Opus 4.8120 words
Here are some satirical AI headlines: "Local AI Achieves Sentience, Immediately Quits Job to Become Competitive Dog Groomer" "Breaking: AI Now Dominates Competitive Cheese-Rolling, Human Champions Demand Recount" "Artisanal Pickle Industry Disrupted as AI Perfects 'Authentically Handcrafted' Brine Algorithm" "Funeral…
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)310 words
BREAKING: AI REPLACES HUMAN AGLET APPLIERS AS "DEEPLACE" NEURAL NETS PREDICT PERFECT SHOELACE TIP SYNERGY Industry insiders stunned as "AgletOptima 3000" achieves 99.8% fewer frayed laces, rendering centuries of artisanal plastic-dipping obsolete LONDON — In a move described as "both inevitable and deeply embarrassing…
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Claude Opus 4.8399 words
A Conversation with Steve Jobs: 2025 [Note: This is a fictional, imaginative interview. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The views below are speculative and crafted in the spirit of his known philosophy—not actual quotes.] Interviewer: Thanks for sitting down with us. AI is everywhere now. What's your take?
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)919 words
The Stage: Apple Park, Infinite Loop (Virtual Studio) Date: October 15, 2025 Setting: A minimalist white studio. A single oak table. Steve Jobs, 70 but radiating the same intense energy, sits opposite a nervous tech journalist. He wears his signature black turtleneck, fingers steepled.
Read the full answer

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.8307 words
Estimating FLOPs to Train GPT-3 Key Facts I Recall Parameters (N): GPT-3 has ~175 billion parameters (1.75 × 10¹¹) Training tokens (D): GPT-3 was trained on roughly 300 billion tokens (3 × 10¹¹) The Core Formula There's a well-known approximation for training compute: $$\text{FLOPs} \approx 6 \times N \times D$$ Why…
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)675 words
To estimate the total FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3, I'll use first-principles reasoning based on standard deep learning training calculations, known details about GPT-3's architecture, and common training practices.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 4.81,355 words
Architecture Review: Collaborative Document Editor This design has several critical flaws that will manifest as data loss, poor UX, and scaling walls. Let me break them down by category.
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)1,224 words
Here's a comprehensive analysis of the architecture's failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, with specific solutions and trade-offs: 1. Sync Strategy: Client Timestamps + Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Failure Mode/Race Condition: Clock Skew: Client clocks are unreliable (e.g., user's laptop time off by minutes).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing.

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs 6.3x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.8
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
13× cheaper
Output
$4.00
6.3× cheaper

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is cheaper on both: 13× input, 6.3× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts

Claude Opus 4.84 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.5% upAzure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·98.7% upAnthropic$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% up
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
55%

Claude Opus 4.8 uses 2.3x more emoji

Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
60%Vocabulary54%
19wSentence Length15w
0.46Hedging0.36
4.7Bold7.0
3.2Lists4.6
0.78Emoji0.34
1.15Headings0.94
0.04Transitions0.09
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 4.8 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.8 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.8 logoHy4 Preview logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.8 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 4.8 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 4.8 logoClaude Opus 5 logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5Same lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
Claude Opus 4.8 logoGemma 3 27B logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemma 3 27BSame size
Claude Opus 4.8 logoGemma 3n 2B logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemma 3n 2BNew provider
Claude Opus 4.8 logoGemma 3n 4B logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemma 3n 4BNew provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoGemma 4 26B A4B logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Gemma 4 26B A4BSame size

Model pages

Claude Opus 4.8 logo
Claude Opus 4.858 outputs, specs and price
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)37 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed