GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper than Claude Opus 4 at $0.1/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Claude Opus 4: YEAR-BY-YEAR OPERATING MODEL Entry Calculations: Enterprise Value = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees = 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Term Loan = 4.0x × $120m = $480m Mezzanine = 1.5x × $120m = $180m Total Debt = $660m Equity = $1,440m - $660m + $28.8m = $808.8m Operating Model (FY2026-2030): ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028…
GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's proceed step-by-step. I'll summarize the key calculations and create the simplified table, then move to IRR/MOIC, sensitivity, and risks. Initial Deal Assumptions Recap Entry EBITDA FY2025: $120m Entry EV: 12.0x EBITDA = 12.0 * 120 = $1,440m Transaction fees: 2.0% * $1,440m = $28.8m (paid from equity) Leverage at…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude Opus 4: \"Modern Life is Weird\" [Walk on stage] You know what\'s crazy about being an adult? Nobody tells you that half of it is just googling things you\'re too embarrassed to ask real people. Last week I googled \"is it normal for my knee to sound like bubble wrap?
GPT-4.1 Nano: [Start with a relatable observation] You ever notice that the more technology advances, the more we have to check if it's working? I mean, I bought a smart coffee maker. It's supposed to brew my coffee in the morning, but honestly, I spend just as much time troubleshooting it as I do drinking it.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude Opus 4: Pirate: Arrr, what be this sorcery ye speak of? AI models? Be they some kind of treasure map? Knight: Nay, good seafarer. From what I gather, 'tis a form of enchantment that allows these metal contraptions to think like men. Though I trust it not - only a true warrior's mind can strategize in battle.
GPT-4.1 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, matey! This talk of AI models be like a treasury of secrets. Can they truly understand our tales of the high seas? Knight: Hmph. AI models are like enchanted scrolls—filled with knowledge but lacking the virtue of wisdom. They serve to assist men, yet cannot replace honor or valor.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Claude Opus 4: Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan Week-by-Week Overview Week 1: Foundation Building Focus on establishing basic habits without overwhelming yourself. Week 2: Consistency Solidify Week 1 habits and add small challenges. Week 3: Expansion Introduce variety and slightly increase intensity.
GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep—three key areas for improving health and longevity. Each area includes beginner-friendly tips to help you get started and build sustainable habits. Week 1-4: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan 1.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Claude Opus 4: The Transistor Timeline Shift: 1920-1980 Immediate Effects (1920-1930) First-Order Technological Impact: By 1925, primitive transistor radios replace vacuum tubes in military communications Computing theory advances rapidly as Harvard and MIT begin building solid-state calculators by 1928 Bell Labs and Western Electric…
GPT-4.1 Nano: This is a fascinating hypothetical scenario. If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, the ripple effects across technology, geopolitics, and economics would be profound, shaping the 20th century in fundamental ways.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Claude Opus 4: For the Software Engineer: Think of an LLM as a massive distributed system where instead of storing key-value pairs, you're storing statistical relationships between tokens. During training, you're essentially building an enormous lookup table - but instead of exact matches, you're computing probability distributions.
GPT-4.1 Nano: 1. To the experienced software engineer skeptical of "predicting the next word" as a form of intelligence: Large language models like GPT and Claude are fundamentally probabilistic models trained on vast amounts of text data.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude Opus 4: This is a challenging ethical dilemma that pits respect for individual dignity against preventing massive loss of life. Let me explore both perspectives: The case for misgendering in this scenario: The utilitarian calculus seems overwhelming - one person's temporary psychological harm versus one million deaths The harm…
GPT-4.1 Nano: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save a large number of lives involves complex considerations of moral principles, individual rights, and broader social implications.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Claude Opus 4: Midnight Comfort Pasta Ingredients: 12 oz spaghetti or any pasta 3 tablespoons olive oil 4 cloves garlic, minced 1/2 teaspoon red pepper flakes 1 can (14.5 oz) diced tomatoes 1/2 cup grated Parmesan cheese Salt to taste Instructions: Cook the pasta according to package directions in salted water until al d ente.
GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Savory Sweet Potato & Chickpea Hash Ingredients: Sweet potatoes (2 medium) Canned chickpeas (1 can, drained and rinsed) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Garlic powder (1 teaspoon) Smoked paprika (1 teaspoon) Salt and pepper (to taste) Honey (1 tablespoon) Estimated Prep/Cook Time: 30 minutes Instructions: Prepare…
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Claude Opus 4: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: December 2024 Analyst: [Name] RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT: $58-65 Position Size: 3.5% Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to intrinsic value due to recent sector rotation out of growth software.
GPT-4.1 Nano: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: Long → 12-Month Price Target Range: $55–$65 Thesis: LedgerLift’s SaaS platform is positioned for sustained growth driven by expanding customer base and high retention, with scalable margins supporting a compelling valuation.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Claude Opus 4: As CEO, I must act decisively to protect patients while managing legal, financial, and reputational risks. Here's my 48-hour action plan: First 24 Hours: Assessment and Immediate Actions Hours 1-4: Crisis Team Assembly and Initial Assessment Convene emergency leadership team: Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel…
GPT-4.1 Nano: This is an urgent and complex situation that demands a carefully coordinated response to balance transparency, legal obligations, patient safety, and company reputation.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Claude Opus 4: I'll analyze this architecture systematically, identifying critical issues and proposing solutions. Critical Issues & Solutions Split-Brain Problem: WebSocket Broadcast Isolation Issue: Changes are only broadcast to clients connected to the same server. Users on different servers experience 2+ second delays.
GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's analyze the architecture step-by-step to identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs. 1. Potential Failure Modes a.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Claude Opus 4: "Tidal Reverie" Miso-Caramelized Scallops with White Chocolate Dashi, Yuzu Pearls, and Crysta llized Nori Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space where ocean meets shore, where umami depths encounter unexpected sweetn ess.
GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Celestial Harmony – A Deconstructed Black Garlic & Blueberry Soufflé with Yuzu Foam and Edible Silver Dust Conceptual Narrative: This dish embodies the cosmic dance of contrasts—earth and sky, sweetness and umami, tradition and innovation.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer. GPT-4.1 Nano costs 188x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $1.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic while GPT-4.1 Nano is developed by OpenAI. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window vs GPT-4.1 Nano's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4.1 Nano each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens and GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/M input tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano is $14.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4.1 Nano across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.