Claude Opus 4 vs QwQ 32B

Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against QwQ 32B by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 40K, tested across 6 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or QwQ 32B?

Claude Opus 4 and QwQ 32B are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 200K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and QwQ 32B

Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while QwQ 32B is from qwen. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B.

Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4
QwQ 32B
QwQ 32BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

QwQ 32B is 50x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Slight edge
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
95%

Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji

Claude Opus 4
QwQ 32B
64%Vocabulary64%
62wSentence Length12w
0.52Hedging0.36
4.4Bold13.6
9.1Lists8.4
0.11Emoji0.00
1.87Headings0.00
0.27Transitions0.39
Based on 16 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4QwQ 32B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions